Teams

GEPTA/Adult 2.5W/Miranda/EPTC#1

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

11 players · average NTRP 2.60 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesValeria Ocana / AnaKaren Aldana vs Delfina Lechuga / Mabel Evans6-1, 6-0
2025-04-27vs GEPTA/Adult 2.5W/Galindo/EPTC#5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesPaola Rojas Miranda / Ana Krystel Heras vs Martha Bazan / Nayeli Moreno3-6, 1-6
2025-04-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnayancy Roldan / Melina Salazar vs Monica Boney / Norma Soto6-4, 6-2
2025-04-06vs GEPTA/Adult 2.5W/Scott/CCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesPaola Rojas Miranda / Melina Salazar vs Stefanie Welsch / Marisol Mcneil6-3, 6-4
2025-03-20Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Vega Renteria / Ana Krystel Heras vs Michelle Jabor / Karyna Vargas3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Alexa Lopez
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #1 Singles 39% · published 3
2.58
Carolina Adame
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 2.5
2.49
Anayancy Roldan
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 2.5
2.31
AnaKaren Aldana
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.13
Ana Krystel Heras
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Mariana Cardenas
published
Melina Salazar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Paola Rojas Miranda
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published
Rebecca Vega Renteria
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published
Sophia De La Parra
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Valeria Ocana
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paola Rojas Miranda + Carolina Adame3741% gamesnot enough data
Rebecca Vega Renteria + Anayancy Roldan404 matchesnot enough data
Anayancy Roldan + Sophia De La Parra213 matchesnot enough data
Alexa Lopez + Sophia De La Parra303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alexa Lopez
17W–7L career · 13 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
2.89
2.5
Carolina Adame
11W–13L career · 11 lines in 2025
0%30%70%
2.58
2.5
Anayancy Roldan
16W–14L career · 13 lines in 2025
0%53%47%
2.49
2.5
AnaKaren Aldana
3W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
0%91%9%
2.31
2.5
Ana Krystel Heras
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Mariana Cardenas
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Melina Salazar
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paola Rojas Miranda
16W–28L career · 22 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Vega Renteria
26W–16L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sophia De La Parra
12W–13L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Valeria Ocana
6W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.