Teams

GEPTA/Adult 2.5W/Galindo/EPTC#5

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

6 players · average NTRP / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-01Lost 01
L#2 DoublesValentina Muir / Nayeli Moreno vs AYLEEN PACE / Monica Ramirez6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2025-05-04Won 10
W#2 DoublesMartha Bazan / Nayeli Moreno vs Cecilia Delgado / Cristina Provencio6-2, 6-0
2025-04-27vs GEPTA/Adult 2.5W/Miranda/EPTC#1Won 20
W#1 SinglesMonica Montalvo vs Alexa Lopez6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMartha Bazan / Nayeli Moreno vs Paola Rojas Miranda / Ana Krystel Heras6-3, 6-1
2025-04-25vs GEPTA/Adult 2.5W/Correa/EPCC#1Split 11
W#1 DoublesNayely Ruiz / Monica Montalvo vs Yadira Gonzalez / Stacey Schaber6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMartha Bazan / Nayeli Moreno vs Alejandra Beltran / Cortney Shimunov0-6, 0-6
2025-04-16Split 11
W#1 DoublesNayely Ruiz / Monica Montalvo vs Kimberly Garcia / Sarah Palacios6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesNayeli Moreno / Martha Bazan vs Monica Boney / Andrea Faugstad4-6, 4-6
2025-04-06Won 20
W#1 DoublesNayely Ruiz / Monica Montalvo vs Jennifer Torres / Karyna Vargas6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMartha Bazan / Nayeli Moreno vs Lizbeth Ozaeta / Analisa Cordova6-3, 6-4
2025-03-23Won 10
W#2 DoublesNayeli Moreno / Monica Montalvo vs Mabel Evans / Adriana Ludwig6-0, 6-1
2025-03-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMonica Montalvo / Martha Bazan vs Cristina Gonzalez / Mara Talamantes6-2, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Martha Bazan
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Monica Montalvo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Nayeli Moreno
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nayely Ruiz
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published
Suleima Villa
usually #1 Doubles 62%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
Valentina Muir
usually #2 Doubles 70%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suleima Villa + Valentina Muir4643% gamesnot enough data
Nayeli Moreno + Martha Bazan3254% gamesnot enough data
Suleima Villa + Nayely Ruiz033 matchesnot enough data
Nayely Ruiz + Nayeli Moreno213 matchesnot enough data
Nayely Ruiz + Monica Montalvo303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martha Bazan
3W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Monica Montalvo
16W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nayeli Moreno
12W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nayely Ruiz
14W–16L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Suleima Villa
21W–30L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Valentina Muir
4W–11L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.