Teams

TTA GREEN

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.43 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-14vs CVTA REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDavid Mead / Dave Kulmann vs David Fitzgerald / Eric Ruthrauff4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAndy Roemersberger vs George Kim1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesFrederick Longobricco / Jeffrey Galloway vs Matthias van de Liefvoort / Thomas Meese1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAndy Floyd / Rich Marks vs Thomas Booth / Landon Hilliard6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2026-07-07vs RCC YELLOWSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAndy Roemersberger / Mark Walter vs Michael Oakes / Paul Raver4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesDave Kulmann vs Werner Taljaard6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJuan Lucero / Andy Floyd vs Andrew Spruiell / Brad Jerome2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Galloway / David Mead vs Jay Rockeman / Damon Coates6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2026-06-30vs BRMST GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAndy Roemersberger / Mark Walter vs David Hartwell / Dwayne CARDOSA6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDave Kulmann vs Andrew Klein6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesFrederick Longobricco / Juan Lucero vs Thomas Quinn / Joel Walter3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAndy Floyd / Rich Marks vs Steve Horace / Glenn Fleckenstein0-6, 4-6
2026-06-23vs LTA-P BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesJuan Lucero / Frederick Longobricco vs Wayne Cobb / Eric Rauschkolb0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesDave Kulmann vs Timothy Rakow6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDavid Mead / Jeffrey Galloway vs Mark Creek / Daniel Baur1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesRich Marks / Andy Floyd vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-16vs BTA-C NAVYLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Galloway / Andy Roemersberger vs Ryan Durfee / JP Reinhard4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesDavid Mead vs Woody Rubin3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRich Marks / Frederick Longobricco vs John Koval / Thomas Phillips4-6, 1-6
2026-06-09vs LTA-Q BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesAndy Roemersberger / Mark Walter vs Shijung Kim / Prabhakar Chandana2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDave Kulmann vs Scott Nguyen6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Galloway / David Mead vs Wilco Bos / Venugopal Garuda3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAndy Floyd / Rich Marks vs Michael Matheson / Jeff Rodanski3-6, 0-6
2026-06-02vs MEA GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndy Roemersberger / Dave Kulmann vs Randolph Dunbar / Chris Gray6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Mead / Jeffrey Galloway vs Andrew Grumhaus / William Fry6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRich Marks / Frederick Longobricco vs Danny Wages / Steve Craig1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Dave Kulmann
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.41
Andy Roemersberger
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.36
Frederick Longobricco
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.33
Jeffrey Galloway
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.22
Mark Walter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Andy Floyd
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
David Mead
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.88
Juan Lucero
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Rich Marks
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Walter + Frederick Longobricco14457% games+4.1% vs expected
Frederick Longobricco + Juan Lucero6849% games+1.8% vs expected
Frederick Longobricco + David Mead4358% games+0.6% vs expected
Jeffrey Galloway + David Mead9457% games−0.9% vs expected
Rich Marks + Andy Floyd1436% games−1.7% vs expected
Frederick Longobricco + Rich Marks3644% games−3.9% vs expected
Mark Walter + David Mead6551% games−5.6% vs expected
David Mead + Juan Lucero0539% games−8.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dave Kulmann
20W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Andy Roemersberger
45W–38L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Frederick Longobricco
85W–61L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Jeffrey Galloway
60W–47L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
Mark Walter
51W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Andy Floyd
20W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
David Mead
41W–36L career · 6 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.16
Juan Lucero
13W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
2.88
3
Rich Marks
36W–74L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.