Teams

LTA-P BLUE

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-14vs LTA-Q BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesWayne Cobb / Eric Eiseman vs Michael Matheson / Jeff Rodanski6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKeith Pollack / Daniel Baur vs Wilco Bos / Prabhakar Chandana5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMark Creek / Lance Dehning vs Daniel Ohlsen / Shijung Kim6-1, 6-0
2026-07-07vs MEA GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesWayne Cobb / Eric Eiseman vs Andrew Grumhaus / Andy Pobywajlo6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLance Dehning vs John Ruder2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKeith Pollack / Eric Rauschkolb vs Bill Martin / William Sivy6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDon Anderson / Daniel Baur vs Danny Wages / Michael McDowell6-3, 6-3
2026-06-30vs CVTA REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesTimothy Rakow / Eric Rauschkolb vs Paul Austin / David Fitzgerald6-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesLance Dehning vs James Atwell6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMark Creek / Daniel Baur vs Eric Ruthrauff / Thomas Meese2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesWayne Cobb / Keith Pollack vs Kelly McKee / Dave Hwang2-6, 3-6
2026-06-23vs TTA GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesWayne Cobb / Eric Rauschkolb vs Juan Lucero / Frederick Longobricco6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesTimothy Rakow vs Dave Kulmann0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMark Creek / Daniel Baur vs David Mead / Jeffrey Galloway6-1, 7-6
2026-06-16vs BRMST GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesEric Rauschkolb / Timothy Rakow vs Phil Strobel / David Hartwell6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesEric Eiseman vs Andrew Klein6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesWayne Cobb / Lance Dehning vs John Post / Glenn Fleckenstein6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDaniel Baur / Nicholas Gluvna vs Philip Cangilla / Dwayne CARDOSA7-5, 6-2
2026-06-09vs RCC YELLOWSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMark Creek / Nicholas Gluvna vs Andrew Grantham / Werner Taljaard3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesEric Eiseman vs Andrew Spruiell6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDaniel Baur / Wayne Cobb vs Paul Raver / Michael Oakes0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesEric Rauschkolb / Lance Dehning vs Jay Rockeman / Damon Coates7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2026-06-02vs BTA-C NAVYLost 13
W#1 DoublesTimothy Rakow / Eric Rauschkolb vs Stuart Dimson / Niels Damrauer7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesEric Eiseman vs Woody Rubin3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesWayne Cobb / Daniel Baur vs Bill Dietz / Reed Mayne6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNicholas Gluvna / Keith Pollack vs John Koval / Stephen Richter6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Eric Eiseman
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.46
Wayne Cobb
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.44
Mark Creek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.44
Lance Dehning
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.36
Nicholas Gluvna
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Keith Pollack
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Daniel Baur
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.28
Eric Rauschkolb
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.26
Timothy Rakow
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.15
Don Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wayne Cobb + Eric Eiseman6068% games+9.7% vs expected
Timothy Rakow + Eric Rauschkolb5356% games+6.3% vs expected
Wayne Cobb + Daniel Baur5647% games+3.1% vs expected
Mark Creek + Don Anderson2349% games−2.8% vs expected
Mark Creek + Daniel Baur2346% gamesnot enough data
Wayne Cobb + Keith Pollack4160% gamesnot enough data
Don Anderson + Daniel Baur4158% gamesnot enough data
Mark Creek + Lance Dehning224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Eric Eiseman
43W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Wayne Cobb
69W–38L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Mark Creek
92W–67L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%65%34%
3.44
Lance Dehning
16W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
Nicholas Gluvna
13W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Keith Pollack
23W–43L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Daniel Baur
78W–38L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Eric Rauschkolb
37W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.28
Timothy Rakow
15W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Don Anderson
23W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
14%86%1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.