Teams

LCTA18/Britton-Crary/Maybank

LCTA 18 & Over Fall League · 18 & over Fall League Women 3.5 Night

8 players · average NTRP 3.20 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings13 teams · 18 & over Fall League Women 3.5 Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LCTA18/Summers/MPR000000
2LCTA18/RICHTER/MPR000000
3LCTA18/Britton-Crary/Maybank000000
4LCTA18/White/Maybank000000
5LCTA18/Godfrey-Jackson/CTC000000
6LCTA18/Austin-Pogrob/Creekside000000
7LCTA18/Boyd-Hiers Creekside000000
8LCTA18/Bjork-Zhang/LTP-DI000000
9LCTA18/Mahony-Hoffman/Brickyard000000
10LCTA18/Kubu/Snee Farm000000
11LCTA18/Pernell/MPR000000
12LCTA18/Stuart/Danny Jones000000
13LCTA18/Christopher/CTC000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Andrea Woolum
published 3.5
3.35
Mandy Coleman
published
Courtney Martin
published 3.5
3.17
Jocelyn Mills
published
3.09
Addie Pate
published 3
3.02
Bethany Britton
published 3
2.87
Eliza Barrett
published 3
Jill Wright
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bethany Britton + Mandy Coleman8457% games+2.1% vs expected
Bethany Britton + Andrea Woolum8754% games−0.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrea Woolum
31W–36L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
Mandy Coleman
78W–70L career · no lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Courtney Martin
32W–22L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jocelyn Mills
45W–33L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Addie Pate
17W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.09
3
Bethany Britton
47W–40L career · no lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Eliza Barrett
4W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
2.87
Jill Wright
26W–23L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.