Teams

LCTA18/Austin-Pogrob/Creekside

LCTA 18 & Over Fall League · 18 & over Fall League Women 3.5 Night

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings13 teams · 18 & over Fall League Women 3.5 Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LCTA18/Summers/MPR000000
2LCTA18/RICHTER/MPR000000
3LCTA18/Britton-Crary/Maybank000000
4LCTA18/White/Maybank000000
5LCTA18/Godfrey-Jackson/CTC000000
6LCTA18/Austin-Pogrob/Creekside000000
7LCTA18/Boyd-Hiers Creekside000000
8LCTA18/Bjork-Zhang/LTP-DI000000
9LCTA18/Mahony-Hoffman/Brickyard000000
10LCTA18/Kubu/Snee Farm000000
11LCTA18/Pernell/MPR000000
12LCTA18/Stuart/Danny Jones000000
13LCTA18/Christopher/CTC000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Holly Gardner
published
3.45
Lauren Pogrob
published
3.42
Ashlee Henney
published 3.5
3.38
Katherine Pauli
published
3.30
3.23
3.16
Alex Austin
published 3.5
3.16
Claire Peters
published 3.5
3.15
Kathleen Stein
published
3.14
Allie McCrae
published 3.5
3.13
Cory Beckham
published 3.5
3.11
Anna Winters
published 3.5
3.03
Aly Sexton
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashlee Henney + Katherine Pauli6071% games+17.4% vs expected
Cory Beckham + Alex Austin18167% games+15.7% vs expected
Holly Gardner + Kathleen Stein7165% games+7.6% vs expected
Mary Catherine Arthur + Holly Gardner14461% games+6.8% vs expected
Katherine Pauli + Holly Gardner11261% games+2.0% vs expected
Lauren Pogrob + Alex Austin5260% games−5.9% vs expected
Ashlee Henney + Lauren Pogrob404 matchesnot enough data
Holly Gardner + Cory Beckham404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Holly Gardner
65W–27L career · no lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.49
Lauren Pogrob
47W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.45
3.5
Ashlee Henney
75W–13L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
Katherine Pauli
63W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Alexandra Vorderbruegge
18W–1L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Mary Catherine Arthur
46W–19L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Alex Austin
48W–13L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Claire Peters
34W–12L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
Kathleen Stein
45W–21L career · no lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.15
3.5
Allie McCrae
17W–35L career · no lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Cory Beckham
50W–17L career · no lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Anna Winters
48W–25L career · no lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Aly Sexton
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.