Teams

SS-LGT WHITE

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT

9 players · average NTRP 4.42 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-27vs LTC-D TEALWon 10
W#2 DoublesLara Callas / Elaine Gailloux vs Lisa Robinson / Marie Nguyen6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-08-20vs SS-LGT PURPLELost 03
L#1 DoublesKate Strecker / Lindsey Markley vs Megan Melucci / Leigh Hardin3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesElaine Gailloux vs Tina Parks5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAlisa Phelps / Tara Sonenstein vs Shannon Kiebler / Debbie Lathrop4-6, 1-6
2024-08-14vs BP GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesElaine Gailloux / Lara Callas vs Joy Herrin / Natalia Isabel Camera Perez1-6, 0-6
2024-08-06vs BP ORANGELost 02
L#1 DoublesAlisa Phelps / Tara Sonenstein vs Denise Hernandez / Irene Arguelles3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesElaine Gailloux vs Christi Valicenti2-6, 2-6
2024-07-30vs LTC-M GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlisa Phelps / Avery Tilney vs Lauren Perry / Denise Belk4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesElaine Gailloux / Lara Callas vs Alli Berry / Rachel Schneider3-6, 4-6
2024-07-23vs LTC-D TEALLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlisa Phelps / Tara Sonenstein vs Michelle Phenicie / Shellie Hall6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesElaine Gailloux vs Aubrey Zahuranec6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMarcela Rascon / Avery Tilney vs Marie Nguyen / Ajyra JONES2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Kate Strecker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Annie Karr
published 4.5
4.08
Avery Tilney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.01
Alisa Phelps
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.96
Lara Callas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.96
Tara Sonenstein
published
3.83
Elaine Gailloux
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Lindsey Markley
published
Marcela Rascon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elaine Gailloux + Lara Callas7353% games+3.0% vs expected
Alisa Phelps + Tara Sonenstein2439% games−13.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kate Strecker
22W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Annie Karr
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Avery Tilney
38W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Alisa Phelps
46W–48L career · 4 lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
4.01
4.5
Lara Callas
115W–38L career · 3 lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
3.96
Tara Sonenstein
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
3.96
4
Elaine Gailloux
88W–42L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.83
Lindsey Markley
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marcela Rascon
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.