Teams

Owens/Pebble Creek/Fhills

2024 Foothills Tri-Level - 18 & over · Women's Group C 3.5-4.0-4.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-08-07vs Graff/HCP/FoothillsWon 10
W#3 DoublesMegan Reid / Ellen Stupka vs Marsha Diamonti / Tracy Kiefer6-3, 6-2
2024-08-02vs Graff/HCP/FoothillsWon 20
W#1 DoublesCandace Scott / Karen Tonks vs Shelby Graff / Kimberly Steele3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCori Peters / Ellen Stupka vs Marsha Diamonti / Elizabeth Allport6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2024-07-31vs Muncy/DV/FoothillsWon 10
W#3 DoublesEllen Stupka / Tracy Nestor vs Jill Reese / Alexa Gerbrands6-3, 6-1
2024-07-29vs Miller/DV/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeanne Ann Lewis / Karen Tonks vs Meghan Copley / Sarah Murphy6-4, 6-4
2024-07-23vs LHCC/Horyza/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Tonks / Angelia Sills vs Deirdre Bolter / Elizabeth Deal5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-07-10vs Muncy/DV/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Tonks / Candace Scott vs Carol Almond / Amanda Berry4-6, 5-7
2024-07-09vs Graff/HCP/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Tonks / Jeanne Ann Lewis vs Shelby Graff / Connie Kleeves7-5, 6-2
2024-06-19vs Graff/HCP/FoothillsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Tonks / Candace Scott vs Tammy Dennis / Amanda Moose2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesEllen Stupka / Tracy Nestor vs Elizabeth Allport / Taylor Newton4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-06-18vs LHCC/Blue/FoothillsLost 01
L#2 DoublesTracy Kiefer / Ellen Stupka vs Rebecca Tate / Regan Eimer2-6, 4-6
2024-06-12vs Muncy/DV/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Tonks / Candace Scott vs Carol Almond / Amanda Berry1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's Group C 3.5-4.0-4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Karen Tonks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Ellen Stupka
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.73
3.66
3.63
Candace Scott
published 4
3.43
Megan Reid
published
3.42
Dawn Owens
published 4
3.12
Cori Peters
published 3.5
3.08
Cori Thompson
published 3.5
Tracy Nestor
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Tonks + Ana Cristina Ivach3256% games+1.3% vs expected
Ellen Stupka + Karen Tonks4452% games−5.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Karen Tonks
123W–132L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Ellen Stupka
72W–37L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Ana Cristina Ivach
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Charlotte Hartman
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Candace Scott
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.63
Megan Reid
24W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
4
Dawn Owens
3W–18L career · no lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
3.42
3.5
Cori Peters
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Cori Thompson
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
3.08
Tracy Nestor
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.