Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CW7.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 7.5

22 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-25vs WILLOW PASS PK CW7.5ALost 01
L#3 DoublesLani Aurelius / Cassie Kim vs Jennifer Do / Stephanie Yee1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLani Aurelius / Janell Mollenhauer vs Lisa Italia / Linda Choi6-1, 6-1
2025-10-06vs MORAGA CC CW7.5AWon 10
W#3 DoublesAudra Lutter / Stefanie Cohen vs Kimberly Hunter / Trish Piatt6-2, 6-0
2025-09-13vs ROUND HILL CC CW7.5AWon 20
W#1 DoublesLani Aurelius / Jennifer Grant vs Trish Nornhold / Rachel Gilchrist6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKathleen Pruden / Stefanie Cohen vs Mihaela Farnholtz / Jill Petersen6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesErin Ackdoe / Stefanie Cohen vs Dana Andrew / Michelle Holcenberg6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Cassie Kim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Athena Lofquist
published 4
3.89
Janell Mollenhauer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.76
Heidi Belton
published
3.72
Amber Golini
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.69
Jennifer Grant
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Shari Gonzalez
published
3.63
Garbo Berger
published
3.62
Olga Ivanova
published
3.60
Sandra Harris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Tami Lightle
published
3.54
Samantha Dullea
published
3.40
Erin Ackdoe
published
3.39
Stefanie Cohen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Kathleen Pruden
published
3.33
Audra Lutter
published 3.5
3.33
Rebecca Kay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Tammie Snyder
published
3.27
Lani Aurelius
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Kayla Baier
published
3.11
Karen Treppa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sally Krapf
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Treppa + Lani Aurelius4351% games+3.9% vs expected
Kayla Baier + Amber Golini314 matchesnot enough data
Athena Lofquist + Cassie Kim303 matchesnot enough data
Athena Lofquist + Janell Mollenhauer213 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Pruden + Olga Ivanova213 matchesnot enough data
Erin Ackdoe + Audra Lutter303 matchesnot enough data
Lani Aurelius + Tammie Snyder123 matchesnot enough data
Stefanie Cohen + Kayla Baier123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cassie Kim
31W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.96
4
Athena Lofquist
26W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
Janell Mollenhauer
22W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
Heidi Belton
27W–11L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
3.5
Amber Golini
36W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.72
Jennifer Grant
14W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Shari Gonzalez
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
Garbo Berger
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
Olga Ivanova
12W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.62
Sandra Harris
24W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.60
Tami Lightle
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
Samantha Dullea
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.54
Erin Ackdoe
12W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Stefanie Cohen
72W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Kathleen Pruden
12W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Audra Lutter
18W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Rebecca Kay
24W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Tammie Snyder
24W–15L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Lani Aurelius
187W–146L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.27
Kayla Baier
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Karen Treppa
17W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.11
Sally Krapf
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.