Teams

NNM 7.0W - Trujillo

2022 USTA Adult 65 & Over League - NNM · 7.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-27vs NNM 7.0W HP-AlcarazWon 30
W#1 DoublesDiane Gutierrez / Dottie Anastasi vs Diane Delfrate / Penny Luehring7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEvangeline Trujillo / Angie Dawson vs Susanna Carlow / Judith Carlisle6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDiana Russell / Mary Ellen Schoen vs Patti Alcaraz / Jodi Holley6-3, 4-5
2022-10-20vs NNM 7.0W - GoodrumLost 12
W#1 DoublesDottie Anastasi / Susan Miller vs Diana Filliman / Lucy Romero6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDiane Gutierrez / IVY LANGAN vs Rhonda Letz / Mary Mihaly3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAngie Dawson / Janet Grado vs Laurel Worth / Patty Amo6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-10-06vs NNM 7.0W SV-MagyaryWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanet Grado / Susan Miller vs Jean Kennedy / Deidre Stratton6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKathleen O'Bryan / IVY LANGAN vs Kathy Clapp / Patricia Davis6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDiana Russell / Evangeline Trujillo vs MJ Gallahan / Deborah Cavaliere3-6, 4-6
2022-09-29vs NNM 7.0W NDB-LaneWon 30
W#1 DoublesIVY LANGAN / Diane Gutierrez vs Ellen Herbertson / Elizabeth McGuire7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDottie Anastasi / Susan Miller vs Sally Lane / Chris Keshian6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJanet Grado / Judy Barrett vs Janet Dosher / Barbara McBee6-4, 6-2
2022-09-22vs NNM 7.0W HP-AlcarazWon 30
W#1 DoublesDiane Gutierrez / Dottie Anastasi vs Patti Alcaraz / Judith Carlisle6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMary Ellen Schoen / IVY LANGAN vs Diane Delfrate / Donna Brennan6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDiana Russell / Angie Dawson vs Pamela Sullivan / Shelley Barker7-5, 6-3
2022-09-13vs NNM 7.0W - GoodrumLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathleen O'Bryan / IVY LANGAN vs Colette Fitzpatrick / Patty Amo6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJudy Barrett / Evangeline Trujillo vs Beverly Goodrum / Betsy Murphy5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAngie Dawson / Diana Russell vs Laurel Worth / June Haughton4-6, 2-6
2022-09-01vs NNM 7.0W SV-MagyaryWon 30
W#1 DoublesDiane Gutierrez / Dottie Anastasi vs MJ Gallahan / Dee Schneider3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Miller / Kathleen O'Bryan vs Barbara Conlon / Deidre Stratton6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDiana Russell / Mary Ellen Schoen vs Kathy Clapp / Jean Kennedy6-4, 6-0
2022-08-25vs NNM 7.0W NDB-LaneWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Miller / Kathleen O'Bryan vs Elizabeth McGuire / Ellen Herbertson5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJanet Grado / Angie Dawson vs Kathleen Barrett / Barbara McBee6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJudy Barrett / Evangeline Trujillo vs Jean Payne / Joan Rozzoni6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NNM 7.0W - Goodrum8019516194
2NNM 7.0W - Trujillo6218617178
3NNM 7.0W SV-Magyary44131126227
4NNM 7.0W NDB-Lane2671737245
5NNM 7.0W HP-Alcaraz0832143270

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Dottie Anastasi
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Diane Gutierrez
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.75
IVY LANGAN
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.51
Diana Russell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Angie Dawson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Evangeline Trujillo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Janet Grado
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Judy Barrett
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kathleen O'Bryan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Mary Ellen Schoen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angie Dawson + Janet Grado111851% games−0.2% vs expected
Diane Gutierrez + IVY LANGAN7555% games−4.5% vs expected
Dottie Anastasi + Angie Dawson4347% games−7.1% vs expected
Judy Barrett + Evangeline Trujillo3448% gamesnot enough data
Diana Russell + Angie Dawson4254% gamesnot enough data
Diana Russell + Evangeline Trujillo2448% gamesnot enough data
Diane Gutierrez + Dottie Anastasi404 matchesnot enough data
IVY LANGAN + Kathleen O'Bryan224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dottie Anastasi
93W–50L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Diane Gutierrez
39W–29L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
IVY LANGAN
61W–76L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Diana Russell
50W–74L career · 5 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
2.51
Angie Dawson
29W–33L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Evangeline Trujillo
17W–17L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Janet Grado
24W–23L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Judy Barrett
12W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathleen O'Bryan
28W–30L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Ellen Schoen
24W–22L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.