Teams

NNM 7.0W NDB-Lane

2022 USTA Adult 65 & Over League - NNM · 7.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-27vs NNM 7.0W SV-MagyaryLost 03
L#1 DoublesEllen Herbertson / Barbara McBee vs Joanne O'Keefe / MJ Gallahan7-5, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChris Keshian / Elizabeth McGuire vs Martha McNaul / Deborah Cavaliere5-7, 3-4
L#3 DoublesJane Tabet / Kathleen Barrett vs Carol Bickelman / Pat Magyary7-5, 4-2
2022-10-13vs NNM 7.0W HP-AlcarazWon 21
L#1 DoublesElizabeth McGuire / Chris Keshian vs Penny Luehring / Diane Delfrate7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJanet Dosher / Kathleen Barrett vs Jodi Holley / Peggy Jenner6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKay Mixon / Barbara McBee vs Susanna Carlow / Judith Carlisle6-1, 6-3
2022-10-06vs NNM 7.0W - GoodrumLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoan Rozzoni / Ellen Herbertson vs Rhonda Letz / Beverly Goodrum2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSally Lane / Chris Keshian vs Diana Filliman / Lucy Romero5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJean Payne / Elizabeth McGuire vs Laurel Worth / Patty Amo1-6, 2-6
2022-09-29vs NNM 7.0W - TrujilloLost 03
L#1 DoublesEllen Herbertson / Elizabeth McGuire vs IVY LANGAN / Diane Gutierrez6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSally Lane / Chris Keshian vs Dottie Anastasi / Susan Miller4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Dosher / Barbara McBee vs Janet Grado / Judy Barrett4-6, 2-6
2022-09-22vs NNM 7.0W SV-MagyaryLost 12
L#1 DoublesEllen Herbertson / Kay Mixon vs Carol Bickelman / MJ Gallahan1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChris Keshian / Sally Lane vs Frances Hahn / Jean Kennedy3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJane Tabet / Janet Dosher vs Joanne O'Keefe / Deborah Cavaliere5-7, 2-6
2022-09-08vs NNM 7.0W HP-AlcarazWon 20
W#2 DoublesSally Lane / Kay Mixon vs Peggy Jenner / Donna Brennan7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBarbara McBee / Jean Payne vs Michele Koffler / Jan Harper6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-09-01vs NNM 7.0W - GoodrumLost 12
L#1 DoublesEllen Herbertson / Kay Mixon vs Rhonda Letz / Beverly Goodrum6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChris Keshian / Barbara McBee vs Laurel Worth / Patty Amo5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathleen Barrett / Jean Payne vs Diana Filliman / June Haughton5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2022-08-25vs NNM 7.0W - TrujilloLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth McGuire / Ellen Herbertson vs Susan Miller / Kathleen O'Bryan7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathleen Barrett / Barbara McBee vs Janet Grado / Angie Dawson3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJean Payne / Joan Rozzoni vs Judy Barrett / Evangeline Trujillo4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NNM 7.0W - Goodrum8019516194
2NNM 7.0W - Trujillo6218617178
3NNM 7.0W SV-Magyary44131126227
4NNM 7.0W NDB-Lane2671737245
5NNM 7.0W HP-Alcaraz0832143270

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Ellen Herbertson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Barbara McBee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.94
Joan Rozzoni
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Elizabeth McGuire
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Chris Keshian
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
Jane Tabet
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Janet Dosher
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jean Payne
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kathleen Barrett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kay Mixon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Sally Lane
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sally Lane + Chris Keshian4748% games+10.2% vs expected
Sally Lane + Joan Rozzoni7165% games+7.7% vs expected
Sally Lane + Ellen Herbertson4259% games+4.0% vs expected
Jean Payne + Ellen Herbertson13454% games+1.3% vs expected
Janet Dosher + Kathleen Barrett191950% games−2.8% vs expected
Ellen Herbertson + Joan Rozzoni5547% games−3.5% vs expected
Jean Payne + Joan Rozzoni4544% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth McGuire + Barbara McBee5357% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ellen Herbertson
88W–46L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Barbara McBee
41W–32L career · 6 lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
2.95
Joan Rozzoni
88W–102L career · 2 lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
2.94
3.5
Elizabeth McGuire
51W–73L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
2.90
3
Chris Keshian
12W–16L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jane Tabet
16W–29L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Janet Dosher
58W–65L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jean Payne
37W–32L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathleen Barrett
40W–53L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kay Mixon
49W–55L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sally Lane
62W–36L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.