Teams

Dare Doubles Munden RTC

2025 USTA League Tennis Mixed 18 & Over Winter-RO · 6.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-03-09vs Racquet Science McCarthy RTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesDiana Kelm / Nathan Hellyer vs Rachel Bulbulian / MICHAEL Jensen6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesShengbing Huang / Lixia Yang vs Yi-Chieh Chen / Brian Gorman6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMelanie Lyden / Phil Teng vs Ian Lanza / Charie Diehn6-3, 7-6
2025-03-02vs Northern/Balcom/18&Over6.0XDLost 12
L#1 DoublesSarah Chalmers / Muhammad Shah vs Kevin Cunningham / Marina Walther-Antonio1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLixia Yang / Shuai Leng vs Amy Czaplewski / Daiki Hara6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMadison Couser / Phil Teng vs Becky Westerhouse / Maurice Westerhouse3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 DoublesMelanie Lyden / Phil Teng vs Leslie Clark / Mircea Jerghiuta6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMadison Couser / Nathan Hellyer vs Colleen Batcheler / Patrick Wieneke6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesShengbing Huang / Lihong He vs Randall Brock / Twyla Kuha6-4, 6-1
2025-02-16vs Racquet Science McCarthy RTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesPhil Teng / Lihong He vs Kathleen McCarthy / MICHAEL Jensen7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMelanie Lyden / Muhammad Shah vs Yi Lan / Jane Rosenman4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesShengbing Huang / Lixia Yang vs Elizabeth Weikum / Phil Leichty6-1, 6-1
2025-02-02vs Northern/Balcom/18&Over6.0XDWon 21
W#1 DoublesNathan Hellyer / Madison Couser vs Marina Walther-Antonio / Arijit Panda2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMuhammad Shah / Lihong He vs Jaewan Jun / Emma Sunnarborg3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesShuai Leng / Yuki Munden vs Jessica Balcom / Jonghoon Choi3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesNathan Hellyer / Sarah Chalmers vs Mircea Jerghiuta / Colleen Batcheler6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMadison Couser / Phil Teng vs Dennis Mckenzie / Lynne Peterson6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMuhammad Shah / Melanie Lyden vs Hilary DuBrock / Patrick Wieneke6-4, 6-4
2025-01-19vs Racquet Science McCarthy RTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesPhil Teng / Lihong He vs Elizabeth Weikum / MICHAEL Jensen6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNathan Hellyer / Melanie Lyden vs Yi Lan / Charie Diehn7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesShuai Leng / Yuki Munden vs Rachel Bulbulian / Michael Moss6-0, 6-1
2025-01-12vs Northern/Balcom/18&Over6.0XDLost 12
L#1 DoublesMadison Couser / Phil Teng vs Jessica Balcom / Jonghoon Choi6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesYuki Munden / Shengbing Huang vs Emma Sunnarborg / Jaewan Jun6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMelanie Lyden / Muhammad Shah vs Katie Aracena / Arijit Panda6-3, 6-1
W#1 DoublesLixia Yang / Shuai Leng vs Christopher Anderson / Hilary DuBrock6-1
W#2 DoublesShengbing Huang / Yuki Munden vs Randall Brock / Twyla Kuha6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMelanie Lyden / Muhammad Shah vs Dennis Mckenzie / Amelia Barwise6-0, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Lixia Yang
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Sarah Chalmers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Diana Kelm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Lihong He
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.19
Yuki Munden
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.14
Madison Couser
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.92
Melanie Lyden
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.87
Shengbing Huang
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.87
Nathan Hellyer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.75
Shuai Leng
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.73
Phil Teng
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Muhammad Shah
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lixia Yang + Shengbing Huang4162% gamesnot enough data
Melanie Lyden + Muhammad Shah3254% gamesnot enough data
Madison Couser + Phil Teng123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lixia Yang
29W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Sarah Chalmers
21W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Diana Kelm
20W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Lihong He
22W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Yuki Munden
24W–13L career · 7 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Madison Couser
25W–17L career · 8 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Melanie Lyden
30W–23L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Shengbing Huang
23W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.87
Nathan Hellyer
16W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.87
Shuai Leng
16W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
Phil Teng
11W–8L career · 7 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Muhammad Shah
11W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.