Teams

Racquet Science McCarthy RTC

2025 USTA League Tennis Mixed 18 & Over Winter-RO · 6.0 Mixed

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-03-09vs Dare Doubles Munden RTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesRachel Bulbulian / MICHAEL Jensen vs Diana Kelm / Nathan Hellyer1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesYi-Chieh Chen / Brian Gorman vs Shengbing Huang / Lixia Yang0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesIan Lanza / Charie Diehn vs Melanie Lyden / Phil Teng3-6, 6-7
W#1 DoublesCharie Diehn / MICHAEL Jensen vs Mircea Jerghiuta / Paramita Majumder6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesYi-Chieh Chen / Yi Lan vs Patrick Wieneke / Cristina Mantellini2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRachel Bulbulian / Scott Regener vs Dennis Mckenzie / Colleen Batcheler6-2, 6-2
2025-02-23vs Northern/Balcom/18&Over6.0XDLost 03
L#1 DoublesScott Regener / Jane Rosenman vs Maurice Westerhouse / Becky Westerhouse1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Weikum / Michael Moss vs Jessica Balcom / Jonghoon Choi1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKathleen McCarthy / Brian Gorman vs Audra Quandt / Robert Hyde0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-02-16vs Dare Doubles Munden RTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathleen McCarthy / MICHAEL Jensen vs Phil Teng / Lihong He5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesYi Lan / Jane Rosenman vs Melanie Lyden / Muhammad Shah6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Weikum / Phil Leichty vs Shengbing Huang / Lixia Yang1-6, 1-6
2025-02-02vs Mixed Mavericks Barwise/Soares RACLost 12
L#1 DoublesJane Rosenman / Phil Leichty vs Helena Soares / Mircea Jerghiuta4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathleen McCarthy / Ian Lanza vs Patrick Wieneke / Hilary DuBrock6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRachel Bulbulian / Yi Lan vs Katia Pytel / Ronnie Sokotoff7-5, 7-5
2025-01-26vs Northern/Balcom/18&Over6.0XDLost 03
L#1 DoublesJane Rosenman / Michael Moss vs Jessica Balcom / Jonghoon Choi1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Weikum / Phil Leichty vs Anita Stoltenberg / Timothy O'Callaghan2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCharie Diehn / Shaun Palmer vs Amy Czaplewski / Daiki Hara0-6, 3-6
2025-01-19vs Dare Doubles Munden RTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Weikum / MICHAEL Jensen vs Phil Teng / Lihong He2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesYi Lan / Charie Diehn vs Nathan Hellyer / Melanie Lyden5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRachel Bulbulian / Michael Moss vs Shuai Leng / Yuki Munden0-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesKathleen McCarthy / Scott Regener vs Mircea Jerghiuta / Helena Soares5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesIan Lanza / Charie Diehn vs Amelia Barwise / Patrick Wieneke6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJane Rosenman / Brian Gorman vs Lynne Peterson / Gregory Peterson6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-01-05vs Northern/Balcom/18&Over6.0XDLost 03
L#1 DoublesIan Lanza / Rachel Bulbulian vs Kevin Cunningham / Marina Walther-Antonio2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Weikum / MICHAEL Jensen vs Timothy O'Callaghan / Anita Stoltenberg6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesYi-Chieh Chen / Shaun Palmer vs Audra Quandt / Robert Hyde2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Ian Lanza
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.90
Rachel Bulbulian
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.89
Jane Rosenman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.77
Kathleen McCarthy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.76
Charie Diehn
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.75
Elizabeth Weikum
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.28
Yi-Chieh Chen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
MICHAEL Jensen
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Michael Moss
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Nicole Rud
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Phil Leichty
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Scott Regener
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Shaun Palmer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Yi Lan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ian Lanza
27W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Rachel Bulbulian
14W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.90
Jane Rosenman
15W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Kathleen McCarthy
10W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Charie Diehn
16W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Elizabeth Weikum
5W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
2.75
Yi-Chieh Chen
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.28
MICHAEL Jensen
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Moss
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicole Rud
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Phil Leichty
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Regener
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shaun Palmer
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yi Lan
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.