Teams

Pelican Landing / D'Olimpio

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-02-02vs Quail West / C. SeeseWon 10
W#3 DoublesPAMELA ARBOGAST / Susan Berger vs Susan Tiano / Susan Phelps6-1, 6-2
2025-01-16vs Bonita Bay / LehmannWon 30
W#1 DoublesFaith Apt / Ann White vs Karen Kinahan / Mary Jo Quirk6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPAMELA ARBOGAST / Linda Snowden-Kraftzenk vs Renee Archambo / Ann Nobis7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRebecca Matarazzi / Marlene Tatham vs Kristine Mauro / Mary Vauthy6-0, 6-3
L#1 DoublesPAMELA ARBOGAST / Rebecca Matarazzi vs Kate Gredinger / Lorraine Steuerer4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEllen Davis / Linda Snowden-Kraftzenk vs Sue Capps / Barbara Laustsen6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesFrancine D'Olimpio / Ann White vs Bobbi Burnett / Roberta Lewis6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ann White
published 3.5
3.22
Susan Berger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Linda Snowden-Kraftzenk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Faith Apt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Heidi Schliem
published
Ellen Davis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Francine D'Olimpio
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Haely Bates
published
Lori Kading
published
Marlene Tatham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
PAMELA ARBOGAST
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Ramona Allen
published
Rebecca Matarazzi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Tammy Street
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Schliem + Susan Berger213 matchesnot enough data
PAMELA ARBOGAST + Haely Bates303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ann White
27W–24L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Susan Berger
92W–82L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Linda Snowden-Kraftzenk
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.19
Faith Apt
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.18
Heidi Schliem
58W–44L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Ellen Davis
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Francine D'Olimpio
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Haely Bates
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori Kading
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marlene Tatham
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
PAMELA ARBOGAST
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ramona Allen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Matarazzi
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tammy Street
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.