Teams

Quail West / C. Seese

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.43 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-02-27vs Village Walk Bonita / LaggisLost 01
L#3 DoublesEllen Kaplan / Stacey Baum vs Ellen Iverson / Patricia Dewan6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2025-02-20vs Audubon / P. DavisLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Dunbar / Ginny Asgeirsson vs Pam Davis / Michele Stahl3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-02-13vs Bonita Bay / LehmannWon 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Phelps / Karen Romine vs Heidi Nettler / Kristine Mauro5-0
2025-02-06vs Village Walk Bonita / LaggisWon 21
W#1 DoublesPeggy Oneill / Carla Sancin vs Christine Kriss / Margaret Laggis7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCoquette Fluharty / Jennifer Koivu vs Marcia Kenyon / Hope Malin2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesEllen Kaplan / Ginny Asgeirsson vs Vicki MacE / Janet Martin2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-02-02vs Pelican Landing / D'OlimpioSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaren Dunbar / Carla Sancin vs Ellen Davis / Marlene Tatham6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesSusan Tiano / Susan Phelps vs PAMELA ARBOGAST / Susan Berger1-6, 2-6
2025-01-30vs Sterling Oaks /KissMyAce/ AldermanLost 01
L#2 DoublesSusan Phelps / Coquette Fluharty vs Nancy Schultz / Elizabeth Coates6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesGinny Asgeirsson / Karen Dunbar vs Lorraine Steuerer / Kate Gredinger3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Phelps / Karen Romine vs Maria Prochilo / Bobbi Burnett6-4, 7-6
2025-01-09vs Bonita National / WhartonWon 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Phelps / Karen Dunbar vs Laura Cirillo / Robyn Kove7-6, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Natalie Cortese
published 3.5
3.32
Michelle Minor
published
3.27
Carla Sancin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Ada Kimmel
published 3.5
3.23
Karen Romine
published
3.16
Aster Leitner
published 3.5
3.15
Coquette Fluharty
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Jennifer Koivu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Cindy Benike
published 3.5
Christine Seese
published 3
2.73
Stacey Baum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ellen Kaplan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ginny Asgeirsson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Dunbar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Peggy Oneill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Phelps
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Susan Tiano
published
Tricia Blakeslee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Phelps + Tricia Blakeslee6748% gamesnot enough data
Susan Phelps + Natalie Cortese6160% gamesnot enough data
Carla Sancin + Peggy Oneill5061% gamesnot enough data
Susan Phelps + Karen Dunbar213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Natalie Cortese
144W–71L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
Michelle Minor
19W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Carla Sancin
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Ada Kimmel
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Romine
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Aster Leitner
2W–12L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Coquette Fluharty
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
Jennifer Koivu
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Cindy Benike
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.10
3
Christine Seese
14W–35L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacey Baum
28W–48L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%2%
2.73
Ellen Kaplan
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ginny Asgeirsson
7W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Karen Dunbar
38W–76L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Peggy Oneill
7W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Susan Phelps
119W–117L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Tiano
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tricia Blakeslee
24W–90L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.