Teams

Sterling Oaks /KissMyAce/ Alderman

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.42 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-02-27vs Bonita National / WhartonWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Coates / Deanna Fowler vs Terri Higgins / Laura Cirillo6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJennifer Heimmel / Jill Sanders vs Lisa Fontanini / Jane Doe6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLynda Giannetta / Donna Pellegrini Alderman vs Janice Forner / Ellen DiLeo6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2025-02-13vs Village Walk Bonita / LaggisWon 10
W#2 DoublesNancy Schultz / Jennifer Heimmel vs Janet Martin / Patricia Dewan6-3, 6-2
2025-02-06vs Pelican Landing / D'OlimpioLost 01
L#2 DoublesNancy Schultz / Jill Sanders vs Tammy Street / PAMELA ARBOGAST7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNancy Schultz / Kelly Beam vs Lorraine Steuerer / Bobbi Burnett6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-01-30vs Quail West / C. SeeseWon 10
W#2 DoublesNancy Schultz / Elizabeth Coates vs Susan Phelps / Coquette Fluharty3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-01-16Won 10
W#2 DoublesNancy Schultz / Deanna Fowler vs Diane Mancini / Linda Larsen6-3, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Jill Sanders
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Deanna Fowler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Donna Pellegrini Alderman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Elizabeth Coates
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Amy McHale
published 3.5
3.05
Diane Johnston
published 3.5
3.02
DEBORAH Eck
published 3
Jennifer Heimmel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kelly Beam
published
Lynda Giannetta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lynda Guba
published
Nancy Schultz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stacie Osber
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Heimmel + Lynda Giannetta0531% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Coates + Deanna Fowler2347% gamesnot enough data
Lynda Guba + Deanna Fowler123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Sanders
5W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Deanna Fowler
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Donna Pellegrini Alderman
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Coates
25W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Amy McHale
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Diane Johnston
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.05
3
DEBORAH Eck
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Jennifer Heimmel
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kelly Beam
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynda Giannetta
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lynda Guba
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Schultz
46W–57L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacie Osber
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.