Teams

Bonita National / Wharton

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-02-27vs Sterling Oaks /KissMyAce/ AldermanLost 03
L#1 DoublesTerri Higgins / Laura Cirillo vs Elizabeth Coates / Deanna Fowler4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Fontanini / Jane Doe vs Jennifer Heimmel / Jill Sanders7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJanice Forner / Ellen DiLeo vs Lynda Giannetta / Donna Pellegrini Alderman3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-02-13vs Pelican Landing / D'OlimpioWon 10
W#3 DoublesSusan Lindberg / Audra DiDonato vs Marlene Tatham / Francine D'Olimpio6-2, 7-6
2025-02-02vs Village Walk Bonita / LaggisLost 12
L#1 DoublesTerri Higgins / Christine Siciliano vs Marcia Kenyon / Christine Kriss4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Cirillo / Lisa Fontanini vs Joan Ravens / Ann Kremer4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJane Doe / Teresa Regelmann vs Margaret Laggis / Ellen Iverson2-6, 2-6
2025-01-30vs Bonita Bay / LehmannWon 10
W#3 DoublesSusan Lindberg / Audra DiDonato vs Renee Archambo / Joanne Graceman6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusan Lindberg / Audra DiDonato vs Kelly Beam / DEBORAH Eck2-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Angela Carter
published 4
3.50
Lisa Fontanini
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Laura Cirillo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Christine Siciliano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Audra DiDonato
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Susan Lindberg
published
Ellen DiLeo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Heather Hall
published
Janice Forner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kathy Bagnuolo
published
Teresa Regelmann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Terri Higgins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Siciliano + Terri Higgins5263% gamesnot enough data
Laura Cirillo + Terri Higgins3257% gamesnot enough data
Christine Siciliano + Laura Cirillo213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angela Carter
86W–38L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Lisa Fontanini
20W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
Laura Cirillo
21W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Christine Siciliano
12W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Audra DiDonato
94W–159L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Susan Lindberg
11W–13L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Ellen DiLeo
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Heather Hall
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Janice Forner
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kathy Bagnuolo
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Teresa Regelmann
17W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Terri Higgins
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.