Teams

Audubon / P. Davis

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-02-27vs Pelican Landing / D'OlimpioWon 10
W#1 DoublesGail Lockyer / Mary Huber-Olk vs Linda Snowden-Kraftzenk / Tammy Street6-2, 7-6
2025-02-20vs Quail West / C. SeeseLost 01
L#1 DoublesJill Teberg / Mary Huber-Olk vs Peggy Oneill / Carla Sancin4-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesAlexandra Thorne / Mary Huber-Olk vs Lorraine Steuerer / Maria Prochilo6-4, 6-2
2025-02-06vs Bonita National / WhartonLost 01
L#1 DoublesGail Lockyer / Katrina Tiedge vs Lisa Fontanini / Diane Mancini6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-01-30vs Pelican Landing / D'OlimpioLost 01
L#1 DoublesGail Lockyer / Katrina Tiedge vs Rebecca Matarazzi / Marlene Tatham4-6, 6-7
2025-01-16vs Village Walk Bonita / LaggisLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Huber-Olk / Katrina Tiedge vs Margaret Laggis / Christine Kriss5-7, 6-0, 0-1
W#1 DoublesMary Huber-Olk / Katrina Tiedge vs DEBORAH Eck / Lynda Giannetta6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Mary Huber-Olk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Denise Quinn
published 3.5
3.25
Alexandra Thorne
published 3.5
3.13
Leslie Martin
published
3.11
Pam Davis
published
3.08
Jill Teberg
published
2.85
Debbie Lackey
published 3
Gail Lockyer
published
Jennifer Lakefield
published
Karen Angelis
published
Katrina Tiedge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Margie Minkler
published
Michele Stahl
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Teberg + Leslie Martin2446% games+3.8% vs expected
Katrina Tiedge + Mary Huber-Olk4261% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mary Huber-Olk
127W–49L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.62
3.5
Denise Quinn
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Alexandra Thorne
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Leslie Martin
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Pam Davis
2W–20L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Jill Teberg
5W–20L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
3
Debbie Lackey
27W–31L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
2.85
Gail Lockyer
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Lakefield
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Angelis
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Katrina Tiedge
45W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Margie Minkler
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michele Stahl
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.