Teams

Newell/LR/BP

2023 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Courtney Newell
published 4
3.78
Laura Allmond
published
3.70
Tiffani Jedlicka
published
3.36
Natalie Gorman
published
3.24
Amy Rainey
published 3.5
3.19
Jaclyn Bracey
published
3.18
3.13
3.06
Haylee Scott
published
3.02
Stephanie Bittle
published
2.63
Maddie Spickard
published
Holly Taylor
published
Jonna Clark
published
Maeve Shaddock
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Courtney Newell + Tiffani Jedlicka3447% games−4.0% vs expected
Laura Allmond + Tiffani Jedlicka404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Courtney Newell
24W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.90
Laura Allmond
39W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
Tiffani Jedlicka
54W–27L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
Natalie Gorman
25W–23L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Amy Rainey
11W–21L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.24
Jaclyn Bracey
22W–12L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
3
Crystal Pennington
11W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%10%90%
3.18
Yerenia Adame Hernandez
22W–18L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
Haylee Scott
11W–15L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
Stephanie Bittle
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.02
Maddie Spickard
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
2.63
Holly Taylor
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jonna Clark
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Maeve Shaddock
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.