Teams

Roth/40/4.0/MX/BEVR

2026 LAF Mixed 40 & Over · 4.0 Laf (40&O) Mixed

16 players · average NTRP 3.92 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-10vs Searle/40/4.0/MX/OCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLance Broussard / Gipson Erwin vs Boyd Snellgrove / Donna Briley7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesNicole Bergeron / Christopher Cook vs Eileen Fruge / John Fontenot5-7, 3-6
2026-06-23vs Searle/40/4.0/MX/OCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoseph Puhekker / Ashley Cooper vs Eileen Fruge / Tynes Mixon6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBen Pok / Amy Abshire vs Boyd Snellgrove / Donna Briley6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJason Quinlan / Jodee Broussard vs Janice Searle / Kelly Lee6-4, 6-4
2026-06-16vs Searle/40/4.0/MX/OCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMorgan Louviere / Bryant Angelle vs Eileen Fruge / Boyd Snellgrove6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesBen Pok / Ashley Cooper vs Janice Searle / Kelly Lee5-7, 3-6
2026-06-09vs Searle/40/4.0/MX/OCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesLouis Roth / Jeanne Marie Savoy vs Boyd Snellgrove / Ruth Larimer6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJennifer Guilbeaux / Ben Pok vs Tynes Mixon / Janice Searle6-4, 6-4
2026-06-02vs Searle/40/4.0/MX/OCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBen Pok / Morgan Louviere vs Donna Briley / Tynes Mixon5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesGipson Erwin / Bryant Angelle vs Janice Searle / Boyd Snellgrove7-6, 7-6
2026-05-26vs Searle/40/4.0/MX/OCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristopher Cook / Nicole Bergeron vs Boyd Snellgrove / Eileen Fruge6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesGipson Erwin / Bryant Angelle vs Ruth Larimer / Tynes Mixon4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeanne Marie Savoy / Guy Harper vs Janice Searle / John Fontenot6-2, 6-2
2026-05-19vs Searle/40/4.0/MX/OCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesBen Pok / Ashley Cooper vs Donna Briley / Kelly Lee6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristopher Cook / Tonya Anderson vs Boyd Snellgrove / Ruth Larimer4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBryant Angelle / Jennifer Guilbeaux vs Eileen Fruge / John Fontenot7-6, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Laf (40&O) Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Roth/40/4.0/MX/BEVR7018310154
2Searle/40/4.0/MX/OCC0731836245

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Jennifer Guilbeaux
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.95
Christopher Cook
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.90
Gipson Erwin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.89
Ben Pok
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.86
Bryant Angelle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.86
Guy Harper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
Jeanne Marie Savoy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.84
Jason Quinlan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Lance Broussard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Louis Roth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Jodee Broussard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Joseph Puhekker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Nicole Bergeron
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.66
Morgan Louviere
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Tonya Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Amy Abshire
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanne Marie Savoy + Bryant Angelle2345% gamesnot enough data
Christopher Cook + Nicole Bergeron213 matchesnot enough data
Christopher Cook + Tonya Anderson213 matchesnot enough data
Morgan Louviere + Ben Pok123 matchesnot enough data
Gipson Erwin + Ben Pok213 matchesnot enough data
Louis Roth + Jeanne Marie Savoy123 matchesnot enough data
Louis Roth + Tonya Anderson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Guilbeaux
26W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
4.04
4
Christopher Cook
27W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Gipson Erwin
14W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Ben Pok
37W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Bryant Angelle
27W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Guy Harper
13W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%85%14%
3.86
Jeanne Marie Savoy
26W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.86
Jason Quinlan
17W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.84
Lance Broussard
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%6%
3.79
Louis Roth
19W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
2%95%3%
3.76
Jodee Broussard
15W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
3.71
Joseph Puhekker
17W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
Nicole Bergeron
25W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
Morgan Louviere
6W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.66
Tonya Anderson
22W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.65
3.5
Amy Abshire
15W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.