Teams

CV-The Lakes/Sandy Eggers

2024 CV Fall Combo Doubles · CV-Women 7.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.70 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-19vs CV-Indian Ridge CC/MorinSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSally Mangina / Denise Roethenmund vs Jamie Bell / Maureen Crover6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarjo Hull / Dianne Dalton vs Carrie Morton / Gianna Riley4-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesMarjo Hull / Dianne Dalton vs Celeste Manolas / Monica McCready2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSally Mangina / Brenda Ouimet vs Staci Munic / Lorna Matthew7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2024-11-21vs CV-Indian Ridge CC/MorinSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMarjo Hull / Janette Lyons vs Kate Slott / Barbara Johns6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeannie Levy / Denise Roethenmund vs Sally Sterling / Betty Matsumoto0-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesSally Mangina / Karen Watson vs Maureen Jaramillo / Susan Hope1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeannie Levy / Denise Roethenmund vs Bernadette Cuyugan / Wanda Ramos3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSally Mangina / Brenda Ouimet vs Ria Lepage / Staci Munic4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMarjo Hull / Janice Creager vs Merri Wells / Celeste Manolas3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-10-31vs CV-Indian Ridge CC/MorinSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSally Mangina / Brenda Ouimet vs Jamie Bell / Susan D Morin4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMarjo Hull / Janice Creager vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV-Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Jeannie Levy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Marjo Hull
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.61
Sally Mangina
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.55
Marie Allman
published
3.35
Brenda Ouimet
published 3.5
3.30
Denise Roethenmund
published 3.5
3.27
Dianne Dalton
published 3.5
Detje Marcel
published
Janette Lyons
published
Janice Creager
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sally Mangina + Marjo Hull9558% games−8.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jeannie Levy
42W–50L career · type S · 2 lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
3.84
Marjo Hull
129W–94L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Sally Mangina
127W–117L career · 5 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.61
Marie Allman
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.55
3.5
Brenda Ouimet
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Denise Roethenmund
12W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Dianne Dalton
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Detje Marcel
6W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Janette Lyons
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Janice Creager
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.