Teams

FTA 4.5W 18 & Over (Jain)

2026 USTA Adult 18 & Over - FTA Sunday · 4.5 Women - Sunday

17 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-19vs FTA18A/Hollytree/BeckerleWon 41
W#1 DoublesSara Hudgens / Elizabeth Holland vs Charlotte Mason / Grace Coleman6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Huggins vs Amy Austin7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichele Jain / Brenna Feirer vs Danielle Beckerle / Michelle Sykes4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 SinglesDorie Fann vs Abbie Foster3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLiza Feniger / Rhonda Watson vs Julianne Foster / Robyn Yarborough7-5, 6-1
2026-03-29vs FTA18A/Hollytree/BeckerleWon 50
W#1 DoublesSara Hudgens / Liza Feniger vs Julianne Foster / Cali Rusk6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMary Paylor vs Jennifer Aikens6-1, 5-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Holland / Karen Warren vs Michelle Sykes / Kirby King6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Huggins vs Charlotte Mason6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Hayduk / Dorie Fann vs Natalie Bieber / Amy Austin6-2, 6-4
2026-03-22vs FTA18A/Brookstone/HowardWon 41
W#1 DoublesLiza Feniger / Sara Hudgens vs Kerry Howard / Kristen Burton6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJennifer Milne vs Julia Fulbright6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichele Jain / Rhonda Watson vs Rebecca Maddox / Emily Welling6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesEmerson Mitchell vs Jeanette Dykes6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTara Walters / Dorothy Ramsey vs Hilary Joseph / Larissa Delo1-6, 1-6
2026-03-08vs FTA18A/Hollytree/BeckerleWon 41
L#1 DoublesTara Walters / Karen Warren vs Jacqueline Sasso / Julianne Foster1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesEmerson Mitchell vs Robyn Yarborough6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrenna Feirer / Lides Withrow vs Grace Coleman / Jennifer Aikens6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMary Paylor vs Amy Austin6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDorie Fann / Kelly Hesketh vs Danielle Beckerle / Carol Rabel6-2, 6-4
2026-03-01vs FTA18A/Brookstone/HowardWon 31
W#1 DoublesMegan Field / Lides Withrow vs Hilary Joseph / Evelyn Bull6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesDorothy Ramsey vs Abigail Stewart4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTara Walters / Mary Paylor vs Kerry Howard / Sarah Etre7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Holland / Brenna Feirer vs Larissa Delo / Jeanette Dykes6-3, 6-3
2026-02-15vs FTA18A/Brookstone/HowardWon 41
L#1 DoublesMichele Jain / Carol Hayduk vs Hilary Joseph / Julia Fulbright3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMary Paylor vs Rebecca Maddox6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDorie Fann / Kelly Hesketh vs Kristen Burton / Evelyn Bull6-0, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJennifer Milne vs Kimey Kyker6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKaren Warren / Lides Withrow vs Kerry Howard / Sarah LaMunion6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women - Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Mary Paylor
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.22
Lides Withrow
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.20
Jennifer Milne
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
4.16
Sara Hudgens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.13
Kelly Hesketh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.12
Megan Field
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.12
Rhonda Watson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.11
Tara Walters
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.08
Carol Hayduk
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.01
Brenna Feirer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.97
Elizabeth Huggins
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.88
Karen Warren
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.87
Liza Feniger
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.80
Michele Jain
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.71
Dorie Fann
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.45
Dorothy Ramsey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Emerson Mitchell
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dorie Fann + Liza Feniger3355% gamesnot enough data
Carol Hayduk + Rhonda Watson134 matchesnot enough data
Rhonda Watson + Liza Feniger404 matchesnot enough data
Dorie Fann + Kelly Hesketh404 matchesnot enough data
Tara Walters + Mary Paylor314 matchesnot enough data
Sara Hudgens + Liza Feniger303 matchesnot enough data
Carol Hayduk + Dorie Fann213 matchesnot enough data
Megan Field + Tara Walters213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Paylor
11W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.26
Lides Withrow
14W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
Jennifer Milne
12W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
4.20
Sara Hudgens
16W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
4.16
Kelly Hesketh
10W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
4.13
Megan Field
12W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
4.12
Rhonda Watson
12W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
4.12
Tara Walters
17W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
4.11
4.5
Carol Hayduk
19W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
4.08
4.5
Brenna Feirer
21W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
4.01
Elizabeth Huggins
22W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.97
Karen Warren
8W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
3.88
Liza Feniger
21W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.87
Michele Jain
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
3.80
Dorie Fann
16W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.71
Dorothy Ramsey
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.45
Emerson Mitchell
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.