Teams

Ch.Kopp18T

2023 Cap Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.0-3.5-4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-18vs Pa.Cochran18TWon 10
W#2 DoublesMandi Chappell / Amy Robinson vs Kathleen Lis / Mary Ann Enzweiler1-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-07-17vs An.Willard18TWon 10
W#3 DoublesMandi Chappell / Melissa Graham vs CAROLINE FLAMANT / Debra Hauge6-2, 6-2
2023-06-29vs Ki.Monsees18TLost 01
L#3 DoublesRamsay Younger / Mandi Chappell vs Margaret Ann Gonella / Cayt Kirkman0-6, 2-6
2023-06-13vs De.Skiko18TLost 01
L#3 DoublesCharlotte Kopp / Mandi Chappell vs Teri O'Neill / Julie Shuey7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-23vs Ki.Johnson18TWon 10
W#3 DoublesMandi Chappell / Ramsay Younger vs Wendy Lindberg / Phyllis Soltz6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0-3.5-4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
LeAnne Bloedon
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.45
Kate Whitney
published
3.38
Allison Crumpler
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.30
Melissa Graham
published
3.28
3.18
Crystal Smith
published 3.5
3.07
Ramsay Younger
published
2.98
Zoe Whitesell
published
2.81
Mandi Chappell
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.67
Charlotte Kopp
published 3
Julie Sullivan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Elizabeth Harrell + LeAnne Bloedon2650% games+0.1% vs expected
Allison Crumpler + LeAnne Bloedon6650% games−11.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
LeAnne Bloedon
119W–73L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
Kate Whitney
2W–10L career · no lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
3.45
3.5
Allison Crumpler
124W–84L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
Melissa Graham
17W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Anne Elizabeth Harrell
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Crystal Smith
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Ramsay Younger
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
3.07
Zoe Whitesell
10W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Mandi Chappell
65W–63L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Charlotte Kopp
3W–12L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%1%
2.67
Julie Sullivan
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.