Teams

UPTA18M/Pandya/Hollytree

2025 UPTA Mixed 18 & over - USTA · 18 Mixed - 4.5

16 players · average NTRP 4.30 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-13vs UPTA18M/McFarland/ACACSportsclubLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Austin / Stewart Austin vs Brenna Feirer / Benny Walker2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesHunter Yarborough / Danielle Beckerle vs William Braun / Julianne Foster2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrian Bartlett / Cali Rusk vs Benjamin McFarland / Elizabeth Holland1-6, 2-6
2025-07-06vs UPTA18M/Fulbright/BrookstoneWon 21
W#1 DoublesSara Hudgens / William Henderson vs Julia Fulbright / Stephen Brown6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRaj Pandya / Danielle Beckerle vs Jackson Dozier / Charlotte Mason6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHunter Yarborough / Michelle Sykes vs Kerry Howard / Luke Wells6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2025-06-29vs UPTA18M/CHILDS/KROCWon 21
W#1 DoublesSara Hudgens / William Henderson vs Bryce Geistfeld / Victoria Go6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBrian Bartlett / Ali Marks vs Eli Herrnstadt / Sarah LaMunion6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Austin / Stewart Austin vs Virginie Poritzky / Chase Kasper6-3, 6-4
2025-06-22vs UPTA18M/McFarland/ACACSportsclubLost 12
L#1 DoublesStone Watson / Ali Marks vs Dorie Fann / Guilherme Vasques1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHunter Yarborough / Jacqueline Sasso vs Hallie Kennedy / Benny Walker7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesWilliam Henderson / Sara Hudgens vs Benjamin McFarland / Julianne Foster6-4, 7-6
2025-06-08vs UPTA18M/Fulbright/BrookstoneLost 12
L#1 DoublesStewart Austin / Natalie Bieber vs Ashlen Chapman / Clay Lollis3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Sasso / Hunter Yarborough vs Julia Fulbright / JAVIER CANALES-ZAVALA7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMichelle Sykes / Enrico Ferri vs Kerry Howard / Luke Wells1-6, 1-6
2025-06-05vs UPTA18M/CHILDS/KROCWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrian Bartlett / Ali Marks vs Chase Kasper / Sarah LaMunion6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesStewart Austin / Natalie Bieber vs Cameron Wise / Victoria Go6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesWilliam Henderson / Danielle Beckerle vs Bryce Geistfeld / Emily Welling6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 Mixed - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ali Marks
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.25
Stewart Austin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.16
Sara Hudgens
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.11
Enrico Ferri
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.07
Jacqueline Sasso
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.06
Brian Bartlett
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.88
SHANNON BOOKTER
published
3.79
Danielle Beckerle
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.77
Amy Austin
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.72
Cali Rusk
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.68
Grace Coleman
published
3.65
Natalie Bieber
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Raj Pandya
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Stone Watson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.51
Michelle Sykes
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Hunter Yarborough
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stewart Austin + Amy Austin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ali Marks
3W–2L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stewart Austin
12W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
4.25
Sara Hudgens
16W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
4.16
Enrico Ferri
112W–73L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
4.11
Jacqueline Sasso
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
4.07
4.5
Brian Bartlett
13W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
SHANNON BOOKTER
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.88
4.5
Danielle Beckerle
30W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
3.79
4
Amy Austin
40W–32L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Cali Rusk
24W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.72
Grace Coleman
16W–12L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.68
Natalie Bieber
39W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Raj Pandya
3W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Stone Watson
3W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Michelle Sykes
56W–35L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
Hunter Yarborough
13W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.