Teams

GEPTA-4.0-Adult/18+W(Tan)(EPTC#5)

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Berenice Loubet
usually #2 Doubles 31%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.14
Bertha Gutierrez
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 35% · published 3.5
Gloria Gomez
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
JENNIFER SIDA
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Jeanette Tan
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Jennifer Woo
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 37% · published
Kristin Romney
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Lilia Moran
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Lori DeLisser
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 35% · published
Melissa Dore
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Nena Torres
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Olivia Guzman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Paulina Caraveo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Selena Solis
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Stephanie Kwan
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gloria Gomez + Lilia Moran9162% games+9.5% vs expected
Stephanie Kwan + Jennifer Woo101049% games−8.5% vs expected
Melissa Dore + Lori DeLisser2446% gamesnot enough data
Gloria Gomez + Lori DeLisser5070% gamesnot enough data
Selena Solis + Lori DeLisser1442% gamesnot enough data
Gloria Gomez + Jeanette Tan314 matchesnot enough data
Gloria Gomez + Melissa Dore314 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Woo + Selena Solis404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Berenice Loubet
32W–31L career · 16 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Bertha Gutierrez
51W–69L career · 17 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
Gloria Gomez
60W–37L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
JENNIFER SIDA
26W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeanette Tan
36W–51L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Woo
81W–101L career · 19 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristin Romney
42W–34L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lilia Moran
30W–17L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori DeLisser
94W–74L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Dore
107W–93L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nena Torres
43W–42L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Olivia Guzman
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paulina Caraveo
17W–16L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Selena Solis
96W–102L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Kwan
29W–43L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.