Teams

FV:Sorry not sorry-summer:Pérez/Boudreaux

2025 NCT Summer Adult 18 & Over Men · 3.0 Adult Men 1

14 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-30vs FV:Almost Aces:Moir/Won 31
W#1 DoublesBreton Boudreaux / Blake Cote vs Arunkumar Balakrishnan / Jackson Lautier6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesTim Ligay vs Tyler Smith6-3, 3-6, 5-4
L#2 DoublesMatthew Monteith / Casey Abbott vs Brian Ha / Clive Thomas0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJeffrey MacEl / David Alkire vs Rafael Gonzalez / Eric Truntz6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-19vs FV:Almost Aces:Moir/Won 21
W#1 DoublesFeng Chen / Jasdeep Singh vs Nicholas Gugliotti / Christopher Lynch6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesBlake Cote vs Jackson Lautier6-0, 7-6
L#2 DoublesCasey Abbott / David Alkire vs Chad Moir / Arunkumar Balakrishnan1-6, 6-2, 4-6
2025-06-10vs FV:Baseline Blasters:Danielsen/Won 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Alkire / Blake Cote vs John Scarfo / John Danielsen6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTim Ligay / Jasdeep Singh vs Paul Braun / Shridhar Prabhu6-3, 6-1
2025-06-02vs FV:Almost Aces:Moir/Won 31
W#1 DoublesBreton Boudreaux / Matthew Monteith vs Eric Truntz / Christopher Lynch6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesTim Ligay vs Nicholas Gugliotti6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJohn Martin-Beaulieu / Matt Salzman vs Rafael Gonzalez / Jackson Lautier6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDavid Alkire / Jeffrey MacEl vs Clive Thomas / Brian Ha6-3, 3-6, 2-6
2025-05-28vs FV:Baseline Blasters:Danielsen/Won 31
W#1 DoublesTim Ligay / Jasdeep Singh vs Pavlos Papasavas / John Scarfo6-7, 6-3, 3-2
W#1 SinglesBlake Cote vs Steven Teiger7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBreton Boudreaux / Aashish Samat vs John Danielsen / John Streff6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJeffrey MacEl / Jason Krasula vs Paul Braun / Paul Vandal2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Adult Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FV:Baseline Blasters:Danielsen/02441085
2FV:Sorry not sorry-summer:Pérez/Boudreaux0411513140
3FV:Almost Aces:Moir/0451124165

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Ricardo Perez
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.24
Breton Boudreaux
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Tim Ligay
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published
3.20
Feng Chen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Blake Cote
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.97
Matt Salzman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Matthew Monteith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
John Martin-Beaulieu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
David Alkire
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Aashish Samat
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Casey Abbott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jasdeep Singh
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jason Krasula
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jeffrey MacEl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matt Salzman + Matthew Monteith7067% games+1.1% vs expected
David Alkire + Casey Abbott134 matchesnot enough data
Feng Chen + Jasdeep Singh303 matchesnot enough data
Feng Chen + Breton Boudreaux303 matchesnot enough data
Ricardo Perez + Breton Boudreaux213 matchesnot enough data
Blake Cote + David Alkire213 matchesnot enough data
Blake Cote + Breton Boudreaux303 matchesnot enough data
David Alkire + Jeffrey MacEl213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ricardo Perez
20W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Breton Boudreaux
35W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Tim Ligay
23W–9L career · 8 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Feng Chen
28W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.20
3
Blake Cote
28W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
Matt Salzman
11W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Matthew Monteith
11W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
John Martin-Beaulieu
16W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
David Alkire
20W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Aashish Samat
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Casey Abbott
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Jasdeep Singh
12W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jason Krasula
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jeffrey MacEl
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.