Teams

FV:Baseline Blasters:Danielsen/

2025 NCT Summer Adult 18 & Over Men · 3.0 Adult Men 1

9 players · average NTRP / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-10vs FV:Almost Aces:Moir/Lost 01
L#1 SinglesEric Wellman vs Nicholas Gugliotti3-6, 4-6
2025-06-12vs FV:Almost Aces:Moir/Won 30
W#1 DoublesPaul Vandal / John Scarfo vs Chad Moir / Jackson Lautier6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesEric Wellman vs Brian Ha4-6, 6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSteven Teiger / Shridhar Prabhu vs Clive Thomas / Rafael Gonzalez4-6, 6-4, 4-3
L#1 DoublesJohn Scarfo / John Danielsen vs David Alkire / Blake Cote1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPaul Braun / Shridhar Prabhu vs Tim Ligay / Jasdeep Singh3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesPavlos Papasavas / John Scarfo vs Tim Ligay / Jasdeep Singh7-6, 3-6, 2-3
L#1 SinglesSteven Teiger vs Blake Cote5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Danielsen / John Streff vs Breton Boudreaux / Aashish Samat4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPaul Braun / Paul Vandal vs Jeffrey MacEl / Jason Krasula6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Adult Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FV:Baseline Blasters:Danielsen/02441085
2FV:Sorry not sorry-summer:Pérez/Boudreaux0411513140
3FV:Almost Aces:Moir/0451124165

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Paul Vandal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Pavlos Papasavas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
John Scarfo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Shridhar Prabhu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Paul Braun
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.72
John Danielsen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.71
Eric Wellman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.69
Steven Teiger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
John Streff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Scarfo + John Danielsen044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Vandal
26W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
Pavlos Papasavas
26W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
John Scarfo
26W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Shridhar Prabhu
15W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Paul Braun
20W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
John Danielsen
25W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Eric Wellman
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Steven Teiger
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
John Streff
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.