Teams

LVTA TEAL

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-30vs LTA SILVERWon 41
W#1 DoublesDawn Hagen / Lesa Morrill-Hughes vs Michelle Snyder / Janine Ledingham7-5, 6-0
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Gowins vs Jen Hutman6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJaclin Elkins / Elizabeth Smith vs Julie Stockert / Charlotte Marsh6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAubrey Woodard vs Lori Mason6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJudy O'Gorman / Nancy Pflughoeft vs Janine Clark / Ann Fitzgerald6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2025-05-22vs FCCC PURPLEWon 41
W#1 DoublesDawn Hagen / Lesa Morrill-Hughes vs Karen Dunbar / Tahni Clay7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Gowins vs Jane Schmelzle6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKim Jensen / Elizabeth Smith vs Lisa Olsen / Mindy Murphy7-5, 6-3
L#2 SinglesAubrey Woodard vs Elaine Valenza6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAustin Johnson / Jaclin Elkins vs Betsy Markey / Jenny McCulloch7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-15vs MLF REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesDawn Hagen / Lesa Morrill-Hughes vs Shannon Ellis / Wendy Saltz3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAustin Johnson / Judy O'Gorman vs Tracy Hutton / Layne Martin2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Gowins vs Megan Mattix6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCathy Simon / Aubrey Woodard vs Corey Green / Tracey Stefanon1-6, 1-6
2025-05-08vs HMTC YELLOWWon 41
L#1 DoublesDawn Hagen / Judy O'Gorman vs Debbie Hansen / Ginger Victor4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Gowins vs Gina Zachman6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCathy Simon / Kim Jensen vs Teresa Adsit / Rona van Sickle3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAubrey Woodard vs Sara Schaffer4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Pflughoeft / Austin Johnson vs Maria Ellis / Wendy Ball6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2025-04-24vs FCCC PURPLEWon 31
L#1 DoublesKim Jensen / Cathy Simon vs Tahni Clay / Karen Dunbar4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Pflughoeft / Judy O'Gorman vs Jane Gronewoller / Cindy Kerig7-5, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAubrey Woodard vs Jennifer Camp6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Smith / Jaclin Elkins vs Jenny McCulloch / Kristie Steinbock6-4, 7-6
2025-04-17vs LTA SILVERWon 40
W#1 DoublesDawn Hagen / Lesa Morrill-Hughes vs Charlotte Marsh / Julie Stockert6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Gowins vs Michelle Snyder6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCathy Simon / Kim Jensen vs Ann Fitzgerald / Janine Clark6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJaclin Elkins / Austin Johnson vs Jency Paul / Susan Keenan6-2, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Kim Jensen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Dawn Hagen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Gowins
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.23
Judy O'Gorman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Jaclin Elkins
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Lesa Morrill-Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Austin Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.02
Aubrey Woodard
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.95
Nancy Pflughoeft
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lesa Morrill-Hughes + Dawn Hagen20857% games+4.0% vs expected
Austin Johnson + Jaclin Elkins6448% games+2.2% vs expected
Lesa Morrill-Hughes + Jaclin Elkins5350% games+1.3% vs expected
Austin Johnson + Lesa Morrill-Hughes4947% games−2.4% vs expected
Judy O'Gorman + Nancy Pflughoeft3746% games−5.9% vs expected
Jaclin Elkins + Nancy Pflughoeft4252% gamesnot enough data
Judy O'Gorman + Dawn Hagen314 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Hagen + Nancy Pflughoeft224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Jensen
35W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Dawn Hagen
43W–35L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Gowins
9W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Judy O'Gorman
58W–79L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Jaclin Elkins
63W–60L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Lesa Morrill-Hughes
83W–71L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Austin Johnson
41W–60L career · 4 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Aubrey Woodard
10W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
3.5
Nancy Pflughoeft
60W–97L career · 3 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.