Teams

Yadkin/Georgitis/18+3.0

2025 Yadkin Valley Singles 18 & Over · Women 3.0 - Wednesday Night

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-23vs Yadkin/Harris/18 3.0Lost 12
L#1 SinglesSamantha Talbott vs Betsy Harris6-7, 0-6
L#2 SinglesTammy LaValley vs Jennifer Baker0-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesMelanie Brost vs Natalie Jennings6-0, 6-1
2025-07-16vs Yadkin/Parker/18 3.0Lost 12
L#1 SinglesAlyssa Howards vs Teresa Cervantes3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesDeana Georgitis vs Carol Parker1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 SinglesTammy LaValley vs Victoria Boysen1-6, 6-7
2025-07-02vs Yadkin/Harris/18 3.0Lost 12
L#1 SinglesInge Smith vs Natalie Jennings6-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMelanie Brost vs Ashley Peters6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesDeana Georgitis vs Whitney Newell6-1, 6-4
2025-06-25vs Yadkin/Parker/18 3.0Won 30
W#1 SinglesMelanie Brost vs Christina Soriano6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesSamantha Talbott vs Dana Alligood6-4, 6-4
W#3 SinglesAlyssa Howards vs Carly Rosenkampff6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-06-11vs Yadkin/Harris/18 3.0Lost 12
L#1 SinglesDeana Georgitis vs Ashley Peters3-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesMelanie Brost vs Claire Devon6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesAlyssa Howards vs Kelly Dugan3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-06-04vs Yadkin/Parker/18 3.0Lost 12
W#1 SinglesSamantha Talbott vs Dana Alligood6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesTammy LaValley vs Cathy Ralston4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesInge Smith vs Penn Broughton6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 - Wednesday Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Melanie Brost
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
3.04
Deana Georgitis
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
3.01
Samantha Talbott
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.81
Alyssa Howards
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.66
Inge Smith
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.62
Tammy LaValley
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deana Georgitis + Melanie Brost6656% games+7.4% vs expected
Alyssa Howards + Tammy LaValley1535% games−6.0% vs expected
Inge Smith + Tammy LaValley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melanie Brost
40W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.17
3
Deana Georgitis
44W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
Samantha Talbott
34W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Alyssa Howards
35W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Inge Smith
12W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
2.66
Tammy LaValley
20W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.