Teams

MD.Winters

2026 CTRL Summer Singles 18 & Over · Summer Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.44 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-19vs MCP.ReinickerWon 20
W#2 SinglesChristine Reinke vs Maura Lever6-4, 6-3
W#3 SinglesKristin Messick vs Abigail Kinchen6-1, 6-1
2026-08-03vs MD.MerchantWon 30
W#1 SinglesAllie Ligay vs Jennifer Locklear6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesChristine Reinke vs Wendy Hanshew6-4, 6-0
W#3 SinglesCait Bauer vs Julia Wade6-2, 6-3
2026-07-27vs NMAC.AlexWon 30
W#1 SinglesAllie Ligay vs Alexandra Dunn6-4, 7-5
W#2 SinglesCait Bauer vs Priya Desai6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesLindsay Winters vs Kace Martin6-4, 6-2
2026-07-20vs NMAC.AlexWon 30
W#1 SinglesChristine Reinke vs Erika Clausson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLindsay Winters vs Jennifer Johnson6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesKristin Messick vs Emily Jones6-2, 6-1
2026-06-18vs MD.MerchantLost 12
L#1 SinglesChristine Reinke vs Jennifer Locklear4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesLindsay Winters vs Karen Merchant6-4, 6-3
L#3 SinglesShari McCandlish vs Wendy Hanshew2-6, 1-6
2026-06-11vs MD.MerchantWon 20
W#1 SinglesAllie Ligay vs Michelle Spangenberg6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesCait Bauer vs Julia Wade6-0, 6-1
2026-06-01vs MCP.ReinickerWon 30
W#1 SinglesChristine Reinke vs Kearsi Kessler7-5, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKristin Messick vs Maura Lever6-1, 6-4
W#3 SinglesCait Bauer vs Abigail Kinchen6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Allie Ligay
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.53
Cait Bauer
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.48
Christine Reinke
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.42
Kristin Messick
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Lindsay Winters
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Meredith Kinkle
published 3.5
3.17
Angie Bostrom
published 3.5
2.87
Shari McCandlish
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allie Ligay + Cait Bauer314 matchesnot enough data
Allie Ligay + Lindsay Winters123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Allie Ligay
202W–66L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.61
3.5
Cait Bauer
86W–51L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Christine Reinke
47W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Kristin Messick
124W–117L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Lindsay Winters
84W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.30
3.5
Meredith Kinkle
62W–58L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Angie Bostrom
6W–6L career · no lines in 2026
12%88%1%
3.17
3
Shari McCandlish
82W–74L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.