Teams

MCAC:Harbilas:Harbilas

2023 Cape Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed FLT 1

15 players · average NTRP 4.42 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-09vs MCAC:Travis:Travis/BraudeLost 02
L#1 DoublesSamuel Majewski / Tia Lilly vs Gregory Cole / Elisa Zawadzkas1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAlison Harbilas / Jon Stetkis Sperco vs Vassilissa Kozoulina / Timothy Santos6-7, 6-7
2023-06-02vs MCAC:Travis:Travis/BraudeLost 03
L#1 DoublesChealsey Giatrelis / Edvar Jardim vs Manny Guerzon / Mary Carroll2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTia Lilly / Samuel Majewski vs Elisa Zawadzkas / Garland Kimmer7-6, 3-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJohnna Hickman / Jack Murphy vs Kyra Travis / Pavel Braude5-7, 1-6
2023-05-19vs MCAC:Travis:Travis/BraudeWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Campbell / Jack Murphy vs Kyra Travis / Pavel Braude5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChealsey Giatrelis / Edvar Jardim vs Timothy Santos / Elisa Zawadzkas6-0, 3-2
L#3 DoublesAlison Harbilas / Michael Schmidt vs Lauren Persson / Devon Puglia1-6, 3-6
2023-05-12vs MCAC:Travis:Travis/BraudeLost 12
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Campbell / Jack Murphy vs Manny Guerzon / Lauren Persson6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAlexander Howard / Johnna Hickman vs Kyra Travis / Pavel Braude5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKara Pease / Kevin Pease vs Vassilissa Kozoulina / Gregory Cole1-6, 1-6
2023-05-05vs MCAC:Travis:Travis/BraudeLost 12
W#1 DoublesAlexander Howard / Tia Lilly vs Manny Guerzon / Mary Carroll6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohnna Hickman / Stuart Hickman vs Elisa Zawadzkas / Garland Kimmer3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJon Stetkis Sperco / Chealsey Giatrelis vs Kyra Travis / Jared Drzal4-5
2023-04-28vs MCAC:Travis:Travis/BraudeWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Campbell / Jack Murphy vs Kyra Travis / David Kroll6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKarin Mazzoni / Alexander Howard vs Elisa Zawadzkas / Pavel Braude3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTia Lilly / James Veninger vs Kim Powell / Edward Mckenna6-4, 5-4
2023-04-14vs MCAC:Travis:Travis/BraudeLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Campbell / Michael Schmidt vs Pavel Braude / Kyra Travis7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChealsey Giatrelis / Jon Stetkis Sperco vs Manny Guerzon / Elisa Zawadzkas6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTia Lilly / James Veninger vs Devon Puglia / Kim Powell2-6, 6-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0 Mixed FLT 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MCAC:Travis:Travis/Braude5214719169
2MCAC:Harbilas:Harbilas2571431218

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.54
Alexander Howard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.14
Edvar Jardim
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.92
James Veninger
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.76
Chealsey Giatrelis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Karin Mazzoni
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Elizabeth Campbell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
3.58
Alison Harbilas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Johnna Hickman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jon Stetkis Sperco
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Kara Pease
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kevin Pease
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Schmidt
published
Samuel Majewski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Stuart Hickman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tia Lilly
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Veninger + Tia Lilly22857% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Alexander Howard
37W–40L career · 3 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
4.54
4.5
Edvar Jardim
96W–62L career · type M · 2 lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
4.14
4
James Veninger
141W–36L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Chealsey Giatrelis
14W–10L career · type M · 6 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
Karin Mazzoni
78W–34L career · 1 line in 2023
9%91%1%
3.68
5
Elizabeth Campbell
83W–32L career · 4 lines in 2023
>99%<1%0%
3.63
4
Alison Harbilas
59W–65L career · 3 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.58
Johnna Hickman
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jon Stetkis Sperco
60W–36L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kara Pease
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Kevin Pease
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Michael Schmidt
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Samuel Majewski
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Stuart Hickman
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Tia Lilly
51W–35L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.