Teams

Stordahl 40 Something

2025 ADULT 40 & OVER SUMMER · 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-16vs LeDoux 2025 Summer FunLost 23
W#1 DoublesShannon Overdahl / Molly Dymit vs Barb Brown / Renee McCloden6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesDunja Sher vs Ingrid Klein6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Shea / Jacqueline Williams vs Beth Arel / Marcia Harris5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKathy Cima / Jill Sisk vs Jacie Hurd / Jane Hamel6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#4 DoublesPamela Snyder / Christina Farrell vs Lisbeth Sjoblad / Kathryn Schneider4-6, 1-6
2025-07-09vs Dean: Eastside GalsLost 12
W#1 DoublesStephanie Shea / Jacqueline Williams vs Stephanie Dean / Mary Henseler6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShannon Overdahl / Christina Farrell vs Jill Petersen / Janna Rohlinger7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKelly Stordahl / Sandra Waryan vs Anne Burt / Gabrielle Meyertholen1-6, 0-6
2025-05-21vs LeDoux 2025 Summer FunLost 13
L#1 DoublesKathy Cima / Molly Dymit vs Barb Brown / Renee McCloden1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSandra Waryan / Stephanie Shea vs Marcia Harris / Beth Arel3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesChristina Farrell / Jill Riverso vs Nancy Koch / Lisa Schroeder6-4, 6-0
L#4 DoublesKelly Stordahl / Nadezda Semenova vs Kathryn Schneider / Ingrid Klein4-6, 5-7
2025-05-14vs Dean: Eastside GalsLost 14
L#1 DoublesCourtney Knutson / Jacqueline Williams vs Blair Pogue / Shannon Quinn1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesShannon Overdahl vs Lucia Gray3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Shea / Jill Sisk vs Sara Lux / Mary Henseler1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Farrell / Sandra Waryan vs Clodagh McAfee / Stephanie Dean1-6, 2-6
W#4 DoublesNadezda Semenova / Pamela Snyder vs Jen Bertsch / Gabrielle Meyertholen7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Jacqueline Williams
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Aimee Speier
published 3.5
3.21
Shannon Overdahl
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.13
Jill Sisk
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Stephanie Shea
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.12
Courtney Knutson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Molly Dymit
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Kathy Cima
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.05
Dunja Sher
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
3.01
Nadezda Semenova
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Christina Farrell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.93
Pamela Snyder
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.28
Kelly Stordahl
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jill Riverso
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sandra Waryan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Dymit + Shannon Overdahl3649% games+6.2% vs expected
Jacqueline Williams + Courtney Knutson51443% games−0.8% vs expected
Christina Farrell + Pamela Snyder2343% games−3.6% vs expected
Shannon Overdahl + Kathy Cima3942% games−3.9% vs expected
Molly Dymit + Kathy Cima81438% games−7.2% vs expected
Kelly Stordahl + Nadezda Semenova224 matchesnot enough data
Jill Sisk + Jacqueline Williams044 matchesnot enough data
Jill Sisk + Stephanie Shea134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jacqueline Williams
31W–49L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Aimee Speier
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shannon Overdahl
15W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
Jill Sisk
22W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Stephanie Shea
2W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Courtney Knutson
5W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Molly Dymit
16W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.07
Kathy Cima
17W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.06
3
Dunja Sher
13W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.05
Nadezda Semenova
19W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
3.5
Christina Farrell
3W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
Pamela Snyder
9W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Kelly Stordahl
10W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
2.28
Jill Riverso
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Waryan
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.