Teams

Dean: Eastside Gals

2025 ADULT 40 & OVER SUMMER · 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-09vs Stordahl 40 SomethingWon 21
L#1 DoublesStephanie Dean / Mary Henseler vs Stephanie Shea / Jacqueline Williams4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJill Petersen / Janna Rohlinger vs Shannon Overdahl / Christina Farrell5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnne Burt / Gabrielle Meyertholen vs Kelly Stordahl / Sandra Waryan6-1, 6-0
2025-06-04vs LeDoux 2025 Summer FunWon 41
W#1 DoublesBlair Pogue / Shannon Quinn vs Barb Brown / Beth Arel6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAngela Lockhart vs Jessica Stone6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesStephanie Dean / Clodagh McAfee vs Janet Nauman / Sarah LeDoux6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAnne Burt / Jill Petersen vs Lisa Schroeder / Lisa Stockmo2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#4 DoublesLucia Gray / Suzanne Schneider vs Heather Legris / Lisbeth Sjoblad6-4, 6-3
2025-05-21vs Ludwig/FranciscoWon 32
W#1 DoublesMary Henseler / Sara Lux vs Megan Douglas / Charlyn Francisco6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLucia Gray vs Courtney Kupsch6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBlair Pogue / Shannon Quinn vs Amy Hove / Stacy Ludwig6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGabrielle Meyertholen / Suzanne Schneider vs Cheri Jacoby / Susan Streif1-6, 5-7
L#4 DoublesJen Bertsch / Anne Burt vs Jennifer Katz / LISA PECK1-6, 3-6
2025-05-14vs Stordahl 40 SomethingWon 41
W#1 DoublesBlair Pogue / Shannon Quinn vs Courtney Knutson / Jacqueline Williams6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLucia Gray vs Shannon Overdahl6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSara Lux / Mary Henseler vs Stephanie Shea / Jill Sisk6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesClodagh McAfee / Stephanie Dean vs Christina Farrell / Sandra Waryan6-1, 6-2
L#4 DoublesJen Bertsch / Gabrielle Meyertholen vs Nadezda Semenova / Pamela Snyder6-7, 3-6
2025-05-07vs LeDoux 2025 Summer FunWon 32
W#1 DoublesMary Henseler / Sara Lux vs Barb Brown / Renee McCloden3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAngela Lockhart vs Jessica Stone3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLucia Gray / Shannon Quinn vs Sarah LeDoux / Beth Arel6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Dean / Clodagh McAfee vs Jacie Hurd / Jane Hamel6-1, 6-0
L#4 DoublesAnne Burt / Gabrielle Meyertholen vs Heather Legris / Lisbeth Sjoblad4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Lucia Gray
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
3.48
Sara Lux
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.47
Clodagh McAfee
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Angela Lockhart
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Stephanie Dean
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.40
Molly Rarig
published
3.34
Blair Pogue
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.17
Jen Bertsch
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Janna Rohlinger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Anne Burt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.05
Gabrielle Meyertholen
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published
Mary Henseler
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Suzanne Schneider
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Dean + Clodagh McAfee16660% games+6.4% vs expected
Anne Burt + Gabrielle Meyertholen3646% games−0.8% vs expected
Mary Henseler + Sara Lux303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lucia Gray
30W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
Sara Lux
7W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Clodagh McAfee
27W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Angela Lockhart
10W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Stephanie Dean
27W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Molly Rarig
21W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Blair Pogue
11W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Jen Bertsch
12W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Janna Rohlinger
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Anne Burt
11W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.09
Gabrielle Meyertholen
14W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Mary Henseler
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Suzanne Schneider
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.