Teams

Ludwig/Francisco

2025 ADULT 40 & OVER SUMMER · 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-29vs Dean: Eastside GalsWon 10
W#3 DoublesSusan Streif / Jennifer Christie vs Janna Rohlinger / Jill Petersen6-2, 6-2
2025-06-25vs Carling/maloney summerWon 10
W#4 DoublesJennifer Christie / Jennifer Katz vs Michelle Nauertz / Christine Horton6-3, 6-3
2025-06-11vs LeDoux 2025 Summer FunWon 40
W#1 DoublesAmy Hove / Emily Andrisevic vs Barb Brown / Kathryn Schneider6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCharlyn Francisco / Susan Streif vs Heather Legris / Jane Hamel6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesVicki Bachmann / Courtney Kupsch vs Lisbeth Sjoblad / Kathy Burns4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#4 DoublesJennifer Katz / LISA PECK vs Jacie Hurd / Lisa Schroeder6-2, 7-6
2025-05-28vs Stordahl 40 SomethingWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Andrisevic / Jennifer Christie vs Kathy Cima / Molly Dymit6-2, 6-1
2025-05-21vs Dean: Eastside GalsLost 23
L#1 DoublesMegan Douglas / Charlyn Francisco vs Mary Henseler / Sara Lux4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCourtney Kupsch vs Lucia Gray3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAmy Hove / Stacy Ludwig vs Blair Pogue / Shannon Quinn4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCheri Jacoby / Susan Streif vs Gabrielle Meyertholen / Suzanne Schneider6-1, 7-5
W#4 DoublesJennifer Katz / LISA PECK vs Jen Bertsch / Anne Burt6-1, 6-3
2025-05-07vs Brady/Ehle 40+ Summer 2025Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Christie / Stacy Ludwig vs Heidi Johnson / Jean Kolstad3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Emily Andrisevic
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Amy Hove
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.52
Jennifer Christie
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.51
Megan Douglas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Vicki Bachmann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Elizabeth Micek
published 3.5
3.37
Courtney Kupsch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Charlyn Francisco
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Tracie Medina
published
3.27
LISA PECK
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Stacy Ludwig
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Susan Streif
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Cheri Jacoby
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jennifer Katz
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracie Medina + LISA PECK4254% games−0.5% vs expected
Stacy Ludwig + Vicki Bachmann4348% games−7.4% vs expected
Stacy Ludwig + Amy Hove3251% gamesnot enough data
Charlyn Francisco + Megan Douglas224 matchesnot enough data
Emily Andrisevic + Amy Hove404 matchesnot enough data
Cheri Jacoby + Tracie Medina033 matchesnot enough data
Courtney Kupsch + Susan Streif213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emily Andrisevic
29W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Amy Hove
37W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Jennifer Christie
72W–53L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
Megan Douglas
25W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
Vicki Bachmann
24W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Elizabeth Micek
22W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Courtney Kupsch
29W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Charlyn Francisco
22W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Tracie Medina
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
LISA PECK
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Stacy Ludwig
14W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Susan Streif
12W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Cheri Jacoby
18W–36L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
Jennifer Katz
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.