Teams

RVR GOLD

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-06vs GSCC BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesZoe Herreid / Carla Ostberg vs Natalie Torres / Jenell Hilderbrand2-6, 4-6
2025-09-27vs GSCC SILVERSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDiane Boat / Audrey Imhoff vs Emily Greener / Heidi Paul6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCarla Ostberg / Zoe Herreid vs Meghan Hegberg / Brady Emens6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-09-15vs GSCC SILVERLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Filiss / Susan Blizzard vs Brady Emens / Amy Thornton4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-09-08vs BASALT GOLDLost 12
L#1 DoublesMakenzie Eshelman / Zoe Herreid vs Valerie Yaw / Lauren Noble1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Filiss vs Denise Taylor2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Blizzard / Audrey Imhoff vs Corin Brucker / Karen Price6-2, 6-1
2025-08-25vs GSCC BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesDiane Boat / Dianne Leoni vs Sasha Enewold / Stacey Adams6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCarla Ostberg / Makenzie Eshelman vs Susie Demers / Natalie Torres6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Katie Bailey
published
3.46
Carla Ostberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Dianne Leoni
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Diane Boat
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Makenzie Eshelman
published
3.32
Zoe Herreid
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Susan Blizzard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Katie Karow
published
3.23
Amy Filiss
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Jill Brewer
published
3.16
Audrey Imhoff
published 3.5
2.96
Tami Cassetty
published
Jennifer Given
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carla Ostberg + Zoe Herreid23267% games+9.9% vs expected
Audrey Imhoff + Carla Ostberg9262% games+9.0% vs expected
Zoe Herreid + Makenzie Eshelman7260% games+7.1% vs expected
Diane Boat + Dianne Leoni3452% games+6.5% vs expected
Diane Boat + Jennifer Given6759% games+3.1% vs expected
Diane Boat + Amy Filiss4456% games−2.8% vs expected
Susan Blizzard + Diane Boat6153% gamesnot enough data
Audrey Imhoff + Zoe Herreid5163% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Bailey
27W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Carla Ostberg
117W–51L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Dianne Leoni
53W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Diane Boat
65W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Makenzie Eshelman
23W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Zoe Herreid
68W–24L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Susan Blizzard
63W–77L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.30
Katie Karow
38W–20L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Amy Filiss
41W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Jill Brewer
5W–14L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Audrey Imhoff
47W–14L career · no lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.16
Tami Cassetty
12W–21L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.96
Jennifer Given
14W–20L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.