Teams

BASALT GOLD

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesCorin Brucker / Valerie Yaw vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-09-29vs GSCC SILVERWon 20
W#1 DoublesLeslie Riddel / Tsvetana Mawicke vs Brady Emens / Erin Zalinski6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMolly Jones / Valerie Yaw vs Amy Thornton / Heather Raney6-1, 6-2
2025-09-15vs GSCC BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesValerie Yaw / Leslie Riddel vs Jenell Hilderbrand / Siri Olsen6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2025-09-08vs RVR GOLDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesValerie Yaw / Lauren Noble vs Makenzie Eshelman / Zoe Herreid6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCorin Brucker / Karen Price vs Susan Blizzard / Audrey Imhoff2-6, 1-6
2025-08-18vs GSCC SILVERSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMolly Jones / Valerie Yaw vs Heidi Paul / Alexandra Braeger6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAshley Richardson / Leslie Riddel vs Lily Freiborg / Meghan Hegberg4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Denise Taylor
published 3.5
3.33
Valerie Yaw
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.30
Karen Price
published
3.24
Tsvetana Mawicke
published
3.23
Lauren Noble
published
3.00
Ashley Richardson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Leslie Riddel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.92
Corin Brucker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.76
Monica Cohan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Riddel + Valerie Yaw2346% games+0.8% vs expected
Leslie Riddel + Ashley Richardson222846% games−0.1% vs expected
Tsvetana Mawicke + Lauren Noble5452% games−0.2% vs expected
Corin Brucker + Leslie Riddel134 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Noble + Valerie Yaw044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Taylor
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Valerie Yaw
26W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Karen Price
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Tsvetana Mawicke
12W–11L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Lauren Noble
11W–14L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Ashley Richardson
41W–53L career · 1 line in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
3.5
Leslie Riddel
34W–47L career · 3 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.94
3.5
Corin Brucker
39W–58L career · 2 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.92
Monica Cohan
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
2.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.