sandra rose
2024 Singles Fun Flex Women · 3.0 W
1 player · average NTRP — / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Flight standings20 teams · 3.0 W
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Rabia Hayden | 6 | 0 | 0 | 31 |
| 2Mari Inagami | 4 | 1 | 4 | 39 |
| 3Jennifer Amadeo | 2 | 2 | 4 | 35 |
| 4Gulay Philip | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9 |
| 5Susan Williams | 1 | 1 | 2 | 16 |
| 6Amélie Vanier | 1 | 1 | 2 | 18 |
| 7Stefanie Kreiger | 1 | 3 | 6 | 45 |
| 8Haidee Bolanos | 1 | 3 | 6 | 41 |
| 9Carola Cazenave | 1 | 3 | 6 | 47 |
| 10sandra rose | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 11Annemarie Rothe | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 12Katherine Curtin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 13Christiana Perrein | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14Lauren Reed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15Nicole Fiftal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16Olga Burke | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 17Ellen Feeney | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18Alexandra Cabral | 0 | 1 | 1 | 13 |
| 19Diane Falconer | 0 | 1 | 2 | 12 |
| 20Andrea Fleischman | 0 | 2 | 4 | 25 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.