Teams

Naples Bay Club / Staropoli

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 9.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.38 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-06vs Glen Eagle/Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCynthia George / Karen Morand vs Marjorie Petruccelli / Ann Pfister-Brown6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2025-02-14vs Glen Eagle/Split 11
W#1 DoublesKaren Defiore / Karen Morand vs Donna Leggoe / Carolyn Matje6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCheryl Cohen / Christy Eibel vs Marjorie Petruccelli / Ann Pfister-Brown0-6, 2-6
2025-01-31vs Glen Eagle/Lost 01
L#3 DoublesChristy Eibel / Jessica Murphy vs Carolyn Matje / Linda Schuda3-6, 2-6
2025-01-24vs Glen Eagle/Lost 01
L#1 DoublesFlora Rodriguez / Christy Eibel vs Ann Pfister-Brown / Marjorie Petruccelli6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 9.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Nannette Staropoli
usually #3 Doubles 65%, also #1 Doubles 24% · published 4.5
Dorie Barber
published 4.5
4.19
Cynthia George
published 4.5
4.14
Flora Rodriguez
published 4.5
4.12
Karen Morand
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.06
Sandee Kozel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
4.00
Karen Defiore
published
3.87
Cheryl Cohen
published 4.5
Christy Eibel
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.16
Jessica Murphy
published
Maureen Wells
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Teresa Sexton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nannette Staropoli + Cynthia George3254% gamesnot enough data
Sandee Kozel + Nannette Staropoli213 matchesnot enough data
Nannette Staropoli + Jessica Murphy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Nannette Staropoli
98W–95L career · 17 lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
4.36
4.5
Dorie Barber
22W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Cynthia George
28W–34L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Flora Rodriguez
10W–24L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Karen Morand
72W–60L career · 6 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
4.12
4
Sandee Kozel
82W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
4.06
Karen Defiore
16W–32L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
4.00
4.5
Cheryl Cohen
82W–56L career · no lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
3.87
4
Christy Eibel
50W–52L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jessica Murphy
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.16
Maureen Wells
56W–49L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Teresa Sexton
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.