Teams

BC-WestEnd/TerriDiamond

2026 ADULT 40 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-01vs BC-Kramer/SarahPucciSplit 11
L#1 SinglesNina Allerton vs Vi Schwartz1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDeborah Hurwicz / Tracy Thompson vs Kat Kolb / Sarah Pucci6-0, 6-2
2026-02-22vs BC-SouthEnd/BridetParrillaLost 12
L#1 DoublesTerri Diamond / Kay Cotter vs Christine Abramowski / Romi Worst2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesTarashaun Hausner vs Laurie Porter4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLeslie Gibbs / Aleta Boston vs Kim Tyler / Jennifer Minich2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-02-15vs BC-LLW-MCC/ShefaliRaoLost 12
L#1 DoublesTerri Diamond / Linda Snyder vs Kristen Stewart / LIsa Cook5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesCaitlin Mcgilley vs Shefali Rao6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesVeronica Deutsch / Serena Jaklich vs Nicole Pacourek / Cambria McCulloch4-6, 5-7
2026-02-01vs BC-AltaVista/JoAnnIshiiWon 21
W#1 DoublesVeronica Deutsch / Serena Jaklich vs Garima Goel / Angie Pradia6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesNina Allerton vs Naomi Obitsu7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKay Cotter / Diane Pryzbylo vs Shelby Campion / Yukiko Fujimoto3-2
2026-01-25vs BC-MiraCosta/KarenNolanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTerri Diamond / Serena Jaklich vs Tracy Carter / Erin Levin6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDeborah Hurwicz / Eve Gentry vs Heidi Gonzalez / Taylor Seyler4-6, 1-6
2026-01-18vs BC-ErnieHowlett/LanVeraWon 21
L#1 DoublesNina Allerton / Aleta Boston vs Toni Bianco / Diana Fasoletti2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesSerena Jaklich vs Xin Xu2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTerri Diamond / Tarashaun Hausner vs Soo Fujishige / Muysean Madden7-5, 6-1
2026-01-11vs BC-MCC/NahiaHossainWon 21
L#1 DoublesLinda Snyder / Diane Pryzbylo vs Ashita Johnson / Jinous Hamidi3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCaitlin Mcgilley vs Lauren Clayton6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLeslie Gibbs / Cheryl Unrein vs Alicia Greene / Sarah Lee6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · BC Women - 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BC-LLW-MCC/ShefaliRao5215615152
2BC-MiraCosta/KarenNolan5213820171
3BC-SouthEnd/BridetParrilla43111023186
4BC-WestEnd/TerriDiamond43111024183
5BC-Kramer/SarahPucci34111026207
6BC-ErnieHowlett/LanVera3491227191
7BC-MCC/NahiaHossain2561534223

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Caitlin Mcgilley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.99
Leslie Gibbs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Serena Jaklich
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.95
Veronica Deutsch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Linda Snyder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Tarashaun Hausner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.79
Nina Allerton
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.78
Deborah Hurwicz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Kay Cotter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Elizabeth Dumont
published 3
2.70
Terri Diamond
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.69
Aleta Boston
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.69
Diane Pryzbylo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.57
Cheryl Unrein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Susan Irvine
published
2.47
Eve Gentry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tracy Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Veronica Deutsch + Serena Jaklich2352% games−3.6% vs expected
Cheryl Unrein + Leslie Gibbs213 matchesnot enough data
Kay Cotter + Terri Diamond033 matchesnot enough data
Terri Diamond + Serena Jaklich213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Caitlin Mcgilley
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.03
Leslie Gibbs
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.99
Serena Jaklich
14W–17L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
Veronica Deutsch
44W–94L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Linda Snyder
108W–100L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Tarashaun Hausner
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
Nina Allerton
12W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Deborah Hurwicz
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Kay Cotter
155W–94L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Elizabeth Dumont
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Terri Diamond
5W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Aleta Boston
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Diane Pryzbylo
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
2.69
3
Cheryl Unrein
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.57
Susan Irvine
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
2.54
Eve Gentry
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.47
Tracy Thompson
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.