Teams

BC-Kramer/SarahPucci

2026 ADULT 40 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.0

23 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-01vs BC-WestEnd/TerriDiamondWon 21
W#1 DoublesOnwilasinee Stern / Kelly Kim vs Kay Cotter / Veronica Deutsch6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesVi Schwartz vs Nina Allerton6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKat Kolb / Sarah Pucci vs Deborah Hurwicz / Tracy Thompson0-6, 2-6
2026-02-22vs BC-LLW-MCC/ShefaliRaoLost 02
L#1 DoublesGina Brady / Vi Schwartz vs Heather Baboolal / Nissa Diederich2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulia Vander Ploeg / Meagan Patterson vs Ashley Goldsmith / Alex Sheehan1-6, 1-6
2026-02-15vs BC-MiraCosta/KarenNolanLost 12
W#1 DoublesLiza Ko / Onwilasinee Stern vs Heidi Gonzalez / Alex Brasch6-1, 7-5
L#1 SinglesMarissa Hewitt vs Danelle Griebenow3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJill Medawar / Judy Chen vs Heidi Thompson / Kristina O'Brien1-6, 0-6
2026-02-01vs BC-MCC/NahiaHossainWon 20
W#1 DoublesKatya Rodriguez / Laura Malandrino vs Sarah Lee / Jinous Hamidi6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMeagan Patterson / Cara Lentz vs Anne DeMartini / Lauren Clayton6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-01-25vs BC-SouthEnd/BridetParrillaLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Pucher / Judy Chen vs Carolyn LaRocca / Karen Lyons3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAlina Mikolaitis vs Laurie Porter6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Cole / Jill Medawar vs Tana Szabo / Camay Chu5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-01-18vs BC-AltaVista/JoAnnIshiiLost 12
L#1 DoublesClara Inciso-Brevig / Julia Vander Ploeg vs Karie Lanterman / Takako Tary1-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesVi Schwartz vs Kyoko Yamada6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMonica Baier / Sarah Pucci vs Angie Pradia / Sabrena Turner2-6, 1-6
2026-01-11vs BC-ErnieHowlett/LanVeraWon 21
W#1 DoublesMeagan Patterson / Lauren Herwitt vs Olga Stepanenko / Evelyn Gossett2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMarissa Hewitt vs Marcela Bermudez3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSue Kim / Gina Brady vs Cindy Du / Aya Tanaka6-3, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · BC Women - 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BC-LLW-MCC/ShefaliRao5215615152
2BC-MiraCosta/KarenNolan5213820171
3BC-SouthEnd/BridetParrilla43111023186
4BC-WestEnd/TerriDiamond43111024183
5BC-Kramer/SarahPucci34111026207
6BC-ErnieHowlett/LanVera3491227191
7BC-MCC/NahiaHossain2561534223

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Onwilasinee Stern
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Liza Ko
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.03
Regina Enriquez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.02
Katya Rodriguez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Alina Mikolaitis
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.93
Kelly Kim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Lauren Herwitt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Alexandra Traut
published 3
Denise Kelley
published 3
2.74
Laura Malandrino
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.74
2.73
Cara Lentz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Vi Schwartz
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Marissa Hewitt
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.70
Clara Inciso-Brevig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Jill Medawar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Gina Brady
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.55
Meagan Patterson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.30
Julia Vander Ploeg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.23
Sarah Pucci
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Pucher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kat Kolb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Monica Baier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Onwilasinee Stern
6W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.36
Liza Ko
10W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.05
Regina Enriquez
8W–14L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.03
Katya Rodriguez
14W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Alina Mikolaitis
9W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.94
Kelly Kim
22W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Lauren Herwitt
6W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Alexandra Traut
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Denise Kelley
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Laura Malandrino
15W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Chrissy Karasavas
1W–6L career · no lines in 2026
4%92%3%
2.74
3
Cara Lentz
7W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Vi Schwartz
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Marissa Hewitt
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Clara Inciso-Brevig
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
8%90%1%
2.70
Jill Medawar
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62
Gina Brady
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Meagan Patterson
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.55
Julia Vander Ploeg
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
2.30
Sarah Pucci
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
2.23
Jennifer Pucher
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Kat Kolb
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Monica Baier
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.