Teams

CTC Lord

2024 OH OV FALL A40&O Charleston · 2024 FALL A 40&O 3.0 MEN Charleston

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-01-13vs Teays Valley EddyWon 40
W#1 DoublesMichael Jarrett / Edward Tiffey vs Tom Smith / Timothy Jones7-6, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAndy Elliot vs Darin White7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichael King / Larry Hurley vs Michael Murphy / Mark Peterson6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMartin Peters / James Lord vs Dana Eddy / Michael Bean7-6, 6-1
2023-12-09vs Teays Valley EddyWon 10
W#2 DoublesShane Schwirian / Larry Hurley vs Michael Murphy / Darin White6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2023-12-02vs Teays Valley EddySplit 11
L#2 DoublesLarry Hurley / Andy Elliot vs Michael Murphy / Darin White5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJames Lord / Brad Hatcher vs James Fox / Michael Bean6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2024 FALL A 40&O 3.0 MEN Charleston have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andy Elliot
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.97
Brad Hatcher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Edward Tiffey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Larry Hurley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Abraham Mitias
published 3
2.74
Martin Peters
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.26
Howard Persinger
published
James Lord
published
Shane Schwirian
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Orcutt
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Singles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Lord + Shane Schwirian123 matchesnot enough data
Abraham Mitias + Howard Persinger033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andy Elliot
13W–20L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Brad Hatcher
21W–21L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.97
Edward Tiffey
12W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.88
Larry Hurley
19W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Abraham Mitias
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Martin Peters
6W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
4%92%3%
2.74
Howard Persinger
0W–12L career · no lines in 2024
95%5%<1%
2.26
James Lord
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Shane Schwirian
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Thomas Orcutt
44W–17L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.