Teams

Teays Valley Eddy

2024 OH OV FALL A40&O Charleston · 2024 FALL A 40&O 3.0 MEN Charleston

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-01-13vs CTC LordLost 02
L#1 SinglesDarin White vs Andy Elliot5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDana Eddy / Michael Bean vs Martin Peters / James Lord6-7, 1-6
2024-01-07vs YMCA MeltonLost 12
L#1 DoublesGlenn Varney / Michael Murphy vs Jeffery MacE / Casey Robinson3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesTimothy Jones / Darin White vs Shad Blount / David Williams6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMark Peterson / Michael Bean vs Jason Hunter / Thomas Apperson4-6, 2-6
2024-01-06vs YMCA MeltonSplit 11
W#1 SinglesDarin White vs Jason Hunter6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMichael Bean / Michael Murphy vs Shane Saunders / Thomas Apperson4-6, 4-6
2023-12-09vs CTC LordLost 02
L#1 DoublesTimothy Jones / Glenn Varney vs Michael Jarrett / David Wells6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Murphy / Darin White vs Shane Schwirian / Larry Hurley4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-12-02vs CTC LordSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMichael Murphy / Darin White vs Larry Hurley / Andy Elliot7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJames Fox / Michael Bean vs James Lord / Brad Hatcher3-6, 0-6
2023-10-07vs YMCA MeltonWon 21
W#1 DoublesTimothy Jones / Dana Eddy vs L Cochran / JL Swecker6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDarin White vs Thomas Apperson6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMark Peterson / Michael Bean vs Jeffery MacE / Jason Hunter0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2024 FALL A 40&O 3.0 MEN Charleston have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Glenn Varney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Dana Eddy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.99
Darin White
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
Michael Bean
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Timothy Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Glenn Varney + Dana Eddy4352% games−2.5% vs expected
Timothy Jones + Dana Eddy1428% gamesnot enough data
Timothy Jones + Glenn Varney033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Glenn Varney
21W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Dana Eddy
39W–75L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Darin White
26W–28L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
2.99
Michael Bean
2W–18L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Timothy Jones
7W–20L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.