Teams

Piney Run

2023 Washington D.C. Adult 40 & Over · Washington D.C. 40 & Over 2.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.67 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-03-25vs DC Tennis ClubWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmber Harrelson / Kisha Clark vs Stephanie Denton / Nancy Haaga6-3, 5-3
2023-03-18vs DC Tennis ClubLost 01
L#2 DoublesSandra Salstrom / Kisha Clark vs Megan Shapiro / Stephanie Denton3-6, 3-6
2023-03-11vs DC Tennis ClubLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnnette Coram / Kisha Clark vs Nancy Lutz / Jennifer Wine5-7, 2-3
2023-03-11vs Gut InstinctLost 01
L#2 DoublesPenelope Wilson / Chamaya Hutchens vs Patricia Prince / Gay Trinkner3-6, 2-5
2023-03-04vs DC Tennis ClubLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnnette Coram / Kisha Clark vs Stephanie Denton / Victoria Potter6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-02-25vs Havin FunWon 10
W#2 DoublesPenelope Wilson / Chamaya Hutchens vs Susan Cole / Kathy Potter6-0, 6-4
2023-02-11vs DC Tennis ClubWon 10
W#2 DoublesKisha Clark / Penelope Wilson vs Stephanie Denton / Elizabeth Richardson6-2, 6-1
2023-02-04vs DC Tennis ClubWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmber Harrelson / Kisha Clark vs Megan Shapiro / Stephanie Denton6-7, 3-2
2023-01-28vs DC Tennis ClubWon 10
W#2 DoublesKisha Clark / Amber Harrelson vs Megan Shapiro / Elizabeth Richardson6-4, 1-3
2023-01-21vs DC Tennis ClubLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnnette Coram / Kisha Clark vs Kelly Kennedy / Jennifer Wine4-6, 2-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Washington D.C. 40 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Sailata Katragadda
published
Amber Harrelson
published 3
2.59
Sandra Salstrom
published
2.50
Penelope Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Annette Coram
published 2.5
2.41
Kisha Clark
usually #2 Doubles 88%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sailata Katragadda + Kisha Clark224 matchesnot enough data
Annette Coram + Penelope Wilson404 matchesnot enough data
Annette Coram + Sandra Salstrom224 matchesnot enough data
Sailata Katragadda + Sandra Salstrom123 matchesnot enough data
Sandra Salstrom + Kisha Clark033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sailata Katragadda
35W–53L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Amber Harrelson
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sandra Salstrom
37W–28L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
2.59
Penelope Wilson
36W–64L career · 2 lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
2.50
2.5
Annette Coram
30W–14L career · no lines in 2023
0%59%41%
2.47
2.5
Kisha Clark
54W–60L career · 8 lines in 2023
0%76%24%
2.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.