Teams

Silver Streaks

2022 55&Over Women · 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.31 / NORTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-08-16vs Northern: Wise AcesLost 12
L#1 DoublesHelena Brady / Sherry Best vs Lori McCaffrey / Martha Fashouer5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRandi Dessingue / Kathleen Kalmer vs Jacqueline Falvey / Leslie Roccario3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDeborah Davis / Suzanne Hauber vs Kathy Slosberg / Suzannah Dormond6-3, 6-1
2022-08-09vs Northern: Wise AcesLost 12
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Hauber / Cathy Griffin vs Lori McCaffrey / Nancy Lott1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRandi Dessingue / Cindy Denney vs Jacqueline Falvey / Leslie Roccario2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJudy Pittz / Kathleen Moran vs Mary Fiess Shaffer / Barbara Glasser7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2022-08-02vs Northern: Wise AcesLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathleen Kalmer / Deborah Davis vs Lori McCaffrey / Karen Zuzek1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Hauber / Cathy Griffin vs Cathy Lott / Leslie Roccario6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSherry Best / Paula Doherty vs Nancy Lott / Mary Fiess Shaffer3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-07-28vs Northern: Wise AcesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPaula Doherty / Randi Dessingue vs Cathy Lott / Barbara Glasser3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJudy Pittz / Christine Marro vs Jacqueline Falvey / Leslie Roccario6-4, 6-3
2022-07-19vs Northern: Wise AcesLost 12
W#1 DoublesJudy Pittz / Christine Marro vs Martha Fashouer / Karen Zuzek7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRandi Dessingue / Helena Brady vs Jacqueline Falvey / Lori McCaffrey2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Davis / Kathleen Kalmer vs Suzannah Dormond / Kathy Slosberg0-6, 3-6
2022-07-12vs Northern: Wise AcesLost 03
L#1 DoublesLinda Dygert / Sherry Best vs Barbara Glasser / Cathy Lott1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Hauber / Helena Brady vs Lori McCaffrey / Suzannah Dormond1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Marro / Cindy Denney vs Jacqueline Falvey / Leslie Roccario7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2022-07-05vs Northern: Wise AcesLost 03
L#1 DoublesLinda Dygert / Judy Pittz vs Cathy Lott / Nancy Lott6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Hauber / Cathy Griffin vs Jacqueline Falvey / Leslie Roccario2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRandi Dessingue / Paula Doherty vs Lori McCaffrey / Suzannah Dormond4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Northern: Wise Aces7016513140
2Silver Streaks0751634228

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Deborah Davis
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.37
Cathy Griffin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Judy Pittz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Christine Marro
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Sherry Best
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Randi Dessingue
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.20
Helena Brady
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.01
Cindy Denney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.94
Kathleen Moran
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Linda Dygert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Kathleen Kalmer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.83
Suzanne Hauber
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.69
Paula Doherty
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judy Pittz + Christine Marro12160% games+8.2% vs expected
Sherry Best + Randi Dessingue4445% games+7.2% vs expected
Cindy Denney + Christine Marro2447% games+2.7% vs expected
Cathy Griffin + Helena Brady3354% games+2.0% vs expected
Kathleen Moran + Cindy Denney3547% games−2.0% vs expected
Linda Dygert + Suzanne Hauber14855% games−3.4% vs expected
Cathy Griffin + Suzanne Hauber5547% games−3.7% vs expected
Kathleen Moran + Judy Pittz2345% games−6.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Deborah Davis
66W–113L career · 7 lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
3.46
3.5
Cathy Griffin
53W–57L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Judy Pittz
67W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Christine Marro
93W–63L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Sherry Best
56W–82L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Randi Dessingue
67W–50L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Helena Brady
31W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.20
3
Cindy Denney
54W–75L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Kathleen Moran
102W–131L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Linda Dygert
84W–87L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Kathleen Kalmer
127W–117L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Suzanne Hauber
68W–90L career · 11 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Paula Doherty
50W–141L career · 3 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.