Teams

Northern: Wise Aces

2022 55&Over Women · 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-08-16vs Silver StreaksWon 21
W#1 DoublesLori McCaffrey / Martha Fashouer vs Helena Brady / Sherry Best7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Falvey / Leslie Roccario vs Randi Dessingue / Kathleen Kalmer6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKathy Slosberg / Suzannah Dormond vs Deborah Davis / Suzanne Hauber3-6, 1-6
2022-08-09vs Silver StreaksWon 21
W#1 DoublesLori McCaffrey / Nancy Lott vs Suzanne Hauber / Cathy Griffin6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Falvey / Leslie Roccario vs Randi Dessingue / Cindy Denney6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMary Fiess Shaffer / Barbara Glasser vs Judy Pittz / Kathleen Moran5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2022-08-02vs Silver StreaksWon 21
W#1 DoublesLori McCaffrey / Karen Zuzek vs Kathleen Kalmer / Deborah Davis6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCathy Lott / Leslie Roccario vs Suzanne Hauber / Cathy Griffin3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Lott / Mary Fiess Shaffer vs Sherry Best / Paula Doherty3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-07-28vs Silver StreaksWon 21
W#1 DoublesCathy Lott / Barbara Glasser vs Paula Doherty / Randi Dessingue6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Falvey / Leslie Roccario vs Judy Pittz / Christine Marro4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLori McCaffrey / Suzannah Dormond vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-19vs Silver StreaksWon 21
L#1 DoublesMartha Fashouer / Karen Zuzek vs Judy Pittz / Christine Marro6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Falvey / Lori McCaffrey vs Randi Dessingue / Helena Brady6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSuzannah Dormond / Kathy Slosberg vs Deborah Davis / Kathleen Kalmer6-0, 6-3
2022-07-12vs Silver StreaksWon 30
W#1 DoublesBarbara Glasser / Cathy Lott vs Linda Dygert / Sherry Best6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLori McCaffrey / Suzannah Dormond vs Suzanne Hauber / Helena Brady6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Falvey / Leslie Roccario vs Christine Marro / Cindy Denney5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-07-05vs Silver StreaksWon 30
W#1 DoublesCathy Lott / Nancy Lott vs Linda Dygert / Judy Pittz1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Falvey / Leslie Roccario vs Suzanne Hauber / Cathy Griffin6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLori McCaffrey / Suzannah Dormond vs Randi Dessingue / Paula Doherty6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Northern: Wise Aces7016513140
2Silver Streaks0751634228

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Suzannah Dormond
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Jacqueline Falvey
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.14
Nancy Lott
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Cathy Lott
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.98
Barbara Glasser
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.86
Kathy Slosberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Zuzek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Leslie Roccario
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Lori McCaffrey
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Martha Fashouer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Fiess Shaffer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Wendi Enright
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendi Enright + Lori McCaffrey5073% games+10.2% vs expected
Jacqueline Falvey + Lori McCaffrey18367% games+9.3% vs expected
Kathy Slosberg + Suzannah Dormond5166% games+5.6% vs expected
Nancy Lott + Lori McCaffrey6062% games+5.1% vs expected
Cathy Lott + Barbara Glasser11555% games+3.0% vs expected
Jacqueline Falvey + Karen Zuzek5150% games+2.7% vs expected
Karen Zuzek + Barbara Glasser1446% games+2.2% vs expected
Jacqueline Falvey + Barbara Glasser1443% games+1.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Suzannah Dormond
143W–142L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Jacqueline Falvey
64W–42L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Nancy Lott
68W–57L career · 3 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Cathy Lott
78W–104L career · 4 lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.00
3.5
Barbara Glasser
158W–189L career · 7 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.98
Kathy Slosberg
29W–26L career · 2 lines in 2022
>99%<1%0%
2.86
Karen Zuzek
33W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Leslie Roccario
20W–19L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lori McCaffrey
118W–50L career · 11 lines in 2022
not enough data
Martha Fashouer
26W–43L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Fiess Shaffer
46W–26L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Wendi Enright
40W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.