Teams

OC Coto de Caza - Melissa

2025 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WD - 4.0

21 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-19vs OC LLW Dana Hills - Dara - 1030Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAllie Bertocchini / Alyse Mastropolo vs JENNIFER BRASCH / Becky Graham4-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesChristy Julianel / Rebecca Brown vs Joy Davis / Sabrina Newton6-0, 6-2
2025-12-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesAlyse Mastropolo / Haleigh Crabtree vs Lisa Stone / Denise Banks6-1, 6-1
2025-10-24vs OC Lifetime San Clemente - KellyWon 10
W#2 DoublesTana Ashton / Alyse Mastropolo vs Heather Donovan / Kristin Jones6-3, 6-3
2025-10-17vs OC NBTC - NedraWon 20
W#2 DoublesMelissa Regan / Erin King vs Carrie Jackson / Tara Tung6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAnn Rommel / Kathy Warren vs Karen Comstock / Donna Cox6-4, 6-2
2025-10-10vs OC Lifetime SC - MerwinWon 10
W#1 DoublesTana Ashton / Alyse Mastropolo vs Lynn Moore / JILL ESLICK7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-03vs OC Irvine Great Park - Ruiz -10Lost 12
L#1 DoublesTammy Hyland / Kelly Coste vs Lori McFerren / Lori Reimers6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJackie Guthrie / Vicki Hanna vs Stacy Tzur / Kathy Zepeda Emerzian6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDana Orsini / Carol Teskey vs Susie Ruiz / Susan Umans3-6, 4-6
2025-09-26vs OC Team Courage LPC - NishaWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlyse Mastropolo / Christy Julianel vs Michelle Smith / Daniela Schardinger6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WD - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Haleigh Crabtree
published 4
4.00
Christy Julianel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.96
Erin King
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.95
Alyse Mastropolo
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.94
Tana Ashton
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.89
Tammy Hyland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Jackie Guthrie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Melissa Regan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Ulrike Leivici
published
3.76
3.73
Vicki Hanna
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Carol Teskey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Allie Bertocchini
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Ann Rommel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Kelly Coste
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Nieves Fragapane
published
3.64
Kathy Warren
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Amal Fatehi
published 4
3.48
Deborah Todd
published 4
3.33
Dana Orsini
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Karah Curtis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Haleigh Crabtree + Tana Ashton5167% games+8.8% vs expected
Erin King + Ulrike Leivici7256% games−1.9% vs expected
Alyse Mastropolo + Tana Ashton314 matchesnot enough data
Tracie Reed-Furlong + Jackie Guthrie123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Haleigh Crabtree
23W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
4.13
4.5
Christy Julianel
15W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
4.00
4
Erin King
12W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Alyse Mastropolo
29W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Tana Ashton
24W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
Tammy Hyland
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Jackie Guthrie
33W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.88
Melissa Regan
25W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.84
Ulrike Leivici
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Tracie Reed-Furlong
47W–34L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
Vicki Hanna
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Carol Teskey
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Allie Bertocchini
13W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Ann Rommel
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Kelly Coste
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.66
Nieves Fragapane
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
Kathy Warren
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Amal Fatehi
0W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
4
Deborah Todd
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Dana Orsini
15W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
Karah Curtis
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.