Teams

OC Irvine Great Park - Ruiz -10

2025 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WD - 4.0

21 players · average NTRP 4.07 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-10-03vs OC Coto de Caza - MelissaWon 21
W#1 DoublesLori McFerren / Lori Reimers vs Tammy Hyland / Kelly Coste3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStacy Tzur / Kathy Zepeda Emerzian vs Jackie Guthrie / Vicki Hanna3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusie Ruiz / Susan Umans vs Dana Orsini / Carol Teskey6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WD - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Mina Whitlock
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4.5
4.17
Nina Berry
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.98
Rachel Tran
published
3.94
Yumiko Tokiwa
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.87
Lori McFerren
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Liz Rapoza
published
3.78
Stephanie Tarzia
published
3.77
Kathy Zepeda Emerzian
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Lily Pham
published
3.75
Vera Garrard
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.69
Susie Ruiz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Lana Dalley
published
3.61
Shauna Blattner
published
3.56
Gia Bao Le
published
3.55
Julie Hull
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.53
Lori Mahoney Jones
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.48
Stacy Tzur
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Jody Brennan
published
3.42
Susan Umans
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Arison Hong
published 3.5
Lori Reimers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jody Brennan + Stacy Tzur3448% games+10.8% vs expected
Yumiko Tokiwa + Lori McFerren14160% games+6.9% vs expected
Yumiko Tokiwa + Vera Garrard22559% games−0.7% vs expected
Kathy Zepeda Emerzian + Liz Rapoza404 matchesnot enough data
Yumiko Tokiwa + Nina Berry303 matchesnot enough data
Lori McFerren + Nina Berry213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Mina Whitlock
121W–50L career · 9 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Nina Berry
112W–62L career · 10 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
Rachel Tran
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Yumiko Tokiwa
209W–92L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.94
Lori McFerren
24W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.87
Liz Rapoza
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Stephanie Tarzia
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.78
Kathy Zepeda Emerzian
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Lily Pham
18W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.77
4
Vera Garrard
110W–54L career · 7 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Susie Ruiz
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Lana Dalley
19W–11L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Shauna Blattner
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Gia Bao Le
15W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.56
4
Julie Hull
94W–108L career · 7 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Lori Mahoney Jones
81W–124L career · 8 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Stacy Tzur
5W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.48
Jody Brennan
9W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
Susan Umans
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.42
3.5
Arison Hong
14W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
Lori Reimers
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.