Teams

TLSHO-Hoglund-Castoria/Trump Tri A

2025 Lake USTA Tri Level 18 & Over · Women's Division A (3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.95 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-29vs TLVWE-Weber/Westport Tri A 18Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKatrina Childers / Jill Hulse-Mack vs Coleen Foye / Susie Adams3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-07-22vs TLVWE-Weber/Westport Tri A 18Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAmy Gandy / Jill Hulse-Mack vs Crystal Regan / Susie Adams6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-07-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesJill Hulse-Mack / Dawn Aldrich vs Crystal Regan / Margaret MacKie6-2, 6-2
2025-06-24vs TLVWE-Weber/Westport Tri A 18Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJill Hulse-Mack / Lisa Pagano vs Coleen Foye / Crystal Regan3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's Division A (3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Margaret Dlugos
published
4.35
Kelly Arzonico
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.26
Bridget Castoria
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.08
Susan Uzarski
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.01
Sarah Hoglund
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.86
Linda Radovich
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.69
Carol Freeman
published 4
3.62
Annie Perrino
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.59
Megan Nordhagen
published
3.48
Lisa Pagano
published
3.44
Katrina Childers
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.29
Dawn Aldrich
published 3.5
3.25
Amy Gandy
published 3.5
3.21
Jill Hulse-Mack
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Uzarski + Kelly Arzonico13163% games+10.3% vs expected
Jill Hulse-Mack + Annie Perrino5848% games+1.0% vs expected
Amy Gandy + Katrina Childers3548% games+0.1% vs expected
Bridget Castoria + Kelly Arzonico23464% games−0.1% vs expected
Bridget Castoria + Sarah Hoglund11459% games−4.3% vs expected
Bridget Castoria + Susan Uzarski15858% games−8.0% vs expected
Linda Radovich + Annie Perrino3554% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Hoglund + Annie Perrino6164% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Dlugos
8W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
4.39
4.5
Kelly Arzonico
92W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
4.35
4.5
Bridget Castoria
122W–68L career · 12 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Susan Uzarski
127W–66L career · 4 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
4.08
4
Sarah Hoglund
94W–21L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
Linda Radovich
85W–82L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Carol Freeman
1W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Annie Perrino
111W–109L career · 10 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
Megan Nordhagen
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
Lisa Pagano
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%44%
3.48
3.5
Katrina Childers
158W–96L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Dawn Aldrich
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Amy Gandy
9W–16L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Jill Hulse-Mack
70W–101L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.