Teams

Court Queens

2026 55&Over Women · 6.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-08-11vs Net AssetsWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoyce Johnson / Julie Wright vs Alice Heffner / Becky Glaser6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMary Barr / Helaine Wohl vs Jody Riger / Elizabeth Sweet6-0, 6-1
2026-08-04vs Volley GirlsWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristine Eckels / Martha Morley vs Donna Bello-hansen / Kathy Orlando6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaurie Guerra / Julie Wright vs Marya Doerfel / Sharon Jacobson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMary Barr / Audrey Gabel vs Dawn Foster / Laura Prah6-2, 6-1
2026-07-28vs NJ:Sending You LoveLost 12
W#1 DoublesChristine Eckels / Martha Morley vs Alison Kelly / Jane Vandervalk6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKaren Hart / Whitney Klein vs Silvana Penava / Cheryl Levine5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAudrey Gabel / Joyce Johnson vs Niena Jerdee / Christine Policano2-6, 2-6
2026-07-21vs Net AssetsWon 30
W#1 DoublesHelaine Wohl / Martha Morley vs Karen Rhee / Pam Lobley6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMary Barr / Laurie Guerra vs Lisa Schor Babin / Jody Riger6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesWhitney Klein / Karen Hart vs Elizabeth Sweet / Susan Tudisco6-3, 6-3
2026-07-14vs Volley GirlsWon 30
W#1 DoublesMartha Morley / Christine Eckels vs Tara Callaghan / Kathy Orlando6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJoyce Johnson / Julie Wright vs Marya Doerfel / Kim Nolan6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLaurie Guerra / Whitney Klein vs Barbara Loscalzo / Laura Prah6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-07-07vs NJ:Sending You LoveLost 12
W#1 DoublesChristine Eckels / Martha Morley vs Silvana Penava / Christine Policano6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJulie Wright / Laurie Guerra vs Jane Vandervalk / Alison Kelly3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesHelaine Wohl / Mary Barr vs Niena Jerdee / Cheryl Levine2-6, 3-6
2026-06-30vs Net AssetsWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristine Eckels / Martha Morley vs Becky Glaser / Susan Tudisco6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJulie Wright / Laurie Guerra vs Karen Rhee / Pam Lobley6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesVicki Im / Mary Barr vs Lisa Schor Babin / Alice Heffner6-1, 6-1
2026-06-23vs Volley GirlsWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoyce Johnson / Martha Morley vs Tara Callaghan / Sharon Jacobson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Wright / Laurie Guerra vs Ronni Ross / Barbara Loscalzo6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesWhitney Klein / Karen Hart vs Marya Doerfel / Dawn Foster6-2, 6-0
2026-06-16vs NJ:Sending You LoveLost 12
W#1 DoublesJoyce Johnson / Martha Morley vs Cheryl Levine / Joyce Schimmel7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLaurie Guerra / Helaine Wohl vs Jane Vandervalk / Alison Kelly3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesWhitney Klein / Mary Barr vs Roseann Todd / Carmen Tucaben3-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Martha Morley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Helaine Wohl
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Christine Eckels
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Audrey Gabel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Karen Hart
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Joyce Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Julie Wright
published
Katherine Pizzo
published
Laurie Guerra
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Mary Barr
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Vicki Im
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Whitney Klein
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Eckels + Martha Morley7070% gamesnot enough data
Karen Hart + Whitney Klein213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martha Morley
16W–8L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06
Helaine Wohl
42W–46L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
2.88
3
Christine Eckels
9W–0L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Audrey Gabel
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
Karen Hart
15W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.54
Joyce Johnson
7W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Julie Wright
2W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Katherine Pizzo
16W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Laurie Guerra
8W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Barr
4W–2L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Vicki Im
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Whitney Klein
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.