Teams

NJ:Sending You Love

2026 55&Over Women · 6.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-08-11vs Volley GirlsWon 30
W#1 DoublesJane Vandervalk / Alison Kelly vs Tara Callaghan / Sharon Jacobson6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNiena Jerdee / Christine Policano vs Donna Bello-hansen / Ronni Ross6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoyce Schimmel / Roseann Todd vs Kim Nolan / Cora Koch6-2, 6-3
2026-08-04vs Net AssetsWon 30
W#1 DoublesNiena Jerdee / Jane Vandervalk vs Alice Heffner / Karen Rhee6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJoyce Schimmel / Nina Gold vs Donna Song / Jody Riger6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSilvana Penava / Christine Policano vs Theresa Dembek / Elizabeth Sweet6-0, 6-0
2026-07-28vs Court QueensWon 21
L#1 DoublesAlison Kelly / Jane Vandervalk vs Christine Eckels / Martha Morley4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSilvana Penava / Cheryl Levine vs Karen Hart / Whitney Klein7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNiena Jerdee / Christine Policano vs Audrey Gabel / Joyce Johnson6-2, 6-2
2026-07-21vs Volley GirlsWon 30
W#1 DoublesCheryl Levine / Alison Kelly vs Tara Callaghan / Sharon Jacobson7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNiena Jerdee / Christine Policano vs Barbara Loscalzo / Ronni Ross6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSilvana Penava / Roseann Todd vs Dawn Foster / Cora Koch6-0, 6-3
2026-07-14vs Net AssetsWon 30
W#1 DoublesNiena Jerdee / Jane Vandervalk vs Susan Tudisco / Elizabeth Sweet6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJoyce Schimmel / Nina Gold vs Karen Rhee / Lisa Schor Babin6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLeslie Gaul / Carmen Tucaben vs Pam Lobley / Theresa Dembek6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-07-07vs Court QueensWon 21
L#1 DoublesSilvana Penava / Christine Policano vs Christine Eckels / Martha Morley4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJane Vandervalk / Alison Kelly vs Julie Wright / Laurie Guerra6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNiena Jerdee / Cheryl Levine vs Helaine Wohl / Mary Barr6-2, 6-3
2026-06-30vs Volley GirlsWon 30
W#1 DoublesNiena Jerdee / Jane Vandervalk vs Sharon Jacobson / Ronni Ross7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesChristine Policano / Cheryl Levine vs Tara Callaghan / Kathy Orlando6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNina Gold / Carmen Tucaben vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-23vs Net AssetsWon 30
W#1 DoublesNiena Jerdee / Jane Vandervalk vs Susan Tudisco / Becky Glaser6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJoyce Schimmel / Nina Gold vs Kathy Hecht / Karen Rhee6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLeslie Gaul / Joann Parker vs Jane Daly / Pam Lobley6-0, 6-0
2026-06-16vs Court QueensWon 21
L#1 DoublesCheryl Levine / Joyce Schimmel vs Joyce Johnson / Martha Morley5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJane Vandervalk / Alison Kelly vs Laurie Guerra / Helaine Wohl6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRoseann Todd / Carmen Tucaben vs Whitney Klein / Mary Barr6-3, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Silvana Penava
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.94
Christine Policano
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.93
Alison Kelly
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.92
Niena Jerdee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.84
Cheryl Levine
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Denise Branca
published 3
2.70
Carmen Tucaben
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jane Vandervalk
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Joann Parker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joyce Schimmel
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Leslie Gaul
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nina Gold
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Roseann Todd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Branca + Joyce Schimmel5946% games+1.5% vs expected
Niena Jerdee + Christine Policano3255% gamesnot enough data
Niena Jerdee + Jane Vandervalk404 matchesnot enough data
Niena Jerdee + Nina Gold224 matchesnot enough data
Jane Vandervalk + Alison Kelly314 matchesnot enough data
Joyce Schimmel + Nina Gold303 matchesnot enough data
Carmen Tucaben + Nina Gold303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Silvana Penava
30W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Christine Policano
7W–9L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Alison Kelly
4W–1L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Niena Jerdee
25W–22L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Cheryl Levine
5W–5L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Denise Branca
19W–35L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Carmen Tucaben
28W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
Jane Vandervalk
9W–2L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Joann Parker
28W–45L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Joyce Schimmel
24W–30L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Leslie Gaul
20W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nina Gold
9W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Roseann Todd
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.